MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1580231888 · doi:10.1215/00182168-83-1-170

A Narrative of Events, since the First of August, 1834

2003· article· en· W1580231888 on OpenAlexaff
David J. Murray

Bibliographic record

VenueHispanic American Historical Review · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCaribbean history, culture, and politics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativeApprenticeshipMemoirConvictContext (archaeology)HistoryBiographyImprisonmentFolklorePrisonPunishment (psychology)LiteratureSociologyArt historyArtPsychologyArchaeologyCriminology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This new edition of an important slave narrative is especially valuable because of the fine introduction by Diana Paton, which places the Williams pamphlet and story within the broader tradition of slave narratives of the Americas. The pamphlet is accompanied by the evidentiary minutes of an inquiry held in Jamaica following the publication of this and other relevant documents; these minutes help illuminate the context and the events that Williams relates. Williams was freed in 1837 by the English Quaker abolitionist Joseph Sturge and then brought to Britain. Sturge arranged for Williams to write a memoir of his experiences as an apprentice in Jamaica, in order to expose its evils to the British public. He also arranged for a Scottish doctor, Archibald Palmer, who had served as a stipendiary magistrate in Jamaica, to take down Williams’ narrative and prepare it for publication.Although Diana Paton situates Williams’ narrative within the Atlantic tradition of slave narratives, she also demonstrates its unique characteristics. Williams was not a slave, but an apprentice. His narrative details his experiences under apprenticeship, the system Britain established as a transition from slavery to free labor following the abolition of slavery within the British empire in 1833. The narrative only covers a period of less than three years, instead of the more usual autobiography telling a life story of slavery and final escape to freedom. Instead, Williams documents a brutal history of punishment, in which he suffered seven floggings and four periods of imprisonment. His vivid description of the prison conditions for Jamaican apprentices, including the brutality of the treadmill and the appalling treatment meted out to women, provided some of the ammunition British abolitionists needed to attack the apprenticeship system and force its early end. The accompanying Report of Evidence, from the inquiry that followed the publication of Williams’s account, offers, in Paton’s words, “rich material for analysis of sexual politics during apprenticeship” (p. xliii). The evidence from the inquiry corroborates Williams’ claim of the sexual abuses practiced on women prisoners.Paton’s careful editorial work succeeds in demonstrating how the ex-slaves of Jamaica helped first to expose the evils of the apprenticeship system, and with the assistance of British abolitionists, ultimately succeeded in bringing it down. She also details the important role played by African Baptist Church leaders in Jamaica in this campaign. James Finlayson, a former apprentice who had purchased his own freedom, was the leader of the Browns Town Baptist Church. He played a key part in the decision to select James Williams to accompany Sturge to Britain, further proof of the contribution made by the African population of Jamaica towards securing their own full freedom. As Diana Paton confirms, “the early abolition of apprenticeship was a real victory for the apprentices” (p. xlvi). This new edition helps both to place the abolition of apprenticeship in the British Caribbean within the wider story of abolition throughout the Americas, and to highlight the key roles slaves and ex-slaves played, both in Jamaica and elsewhere, as agents in their own emancipation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.760
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHispanic American Historical ReviewSame topicCaribbean history, culture, and politicsFrench-language works237,207