MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1580561577 · doi:10.23919/oceans.2011.6107254

Short range localization of Autonomous Underwater Vehicles

2011· article· en· W1580561577 on OpenAlexaffabout
Nicos Pelavas, Carmen E. Lucas, Garry J. Heard

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUnderwater Vehicles and Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBathymetryArcticUnderwaterSubmarineMarine engineeringContinental shelfThe arcticComputer scienceSea iceUnderwater acoustic communicationOceanographyGeologyMeteorologyGeographyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The melting of Arctic ice and the resulting access provided to previously inaccessible regions of the Arctic Ocean has lead to various Arctic exploratory efforts by a number of nations. Canada is collecting Arctic bathymetry survey data in order to define the extent of its continental shelf in accordance with the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Supporting the collection of Arctic bathymetry data are two International Submarine Engineering, Explorer class, Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs). In order to reduce the risk inherent with under-ice AUV operations, Defence Research and Development Canada - Atlantic has designed and built a homing system and a localization system for each of the vehicles. The homing system enables the AUV to find its way to the source of an underwater acoustic signal at ranges in excess of 50 km. In this paper we shall present the localization system, which utilizes a field of acoustic modems allowing the AUV to determine its three dimensional position relative to a reference point. Enhancements to the localization method shall be discussed. These include improvements both at the surface station and the implementation of the algorithm in the vehicle. Lastly, short range localization results from the 2010 Arctic survey trial near Borden Island are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.782
Threshold uncertainty score0.244

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUnderwater Vehicles and Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207