MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W158059670

Participant access control in IP multicasting

2008· book· en· W158059670 on OpenAlexaff
Salekul Islam

Bibliographic record

VenueSpectrum Research Repository (Concordia University) · 2008
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAccess Control and Trust
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer networkMulticastComputer scienceInternet Group Management ProtocolIP multicastSource-specific multicastXcastPragmatic General MulticastProtocol Independent MulticastAuthentication serverAccess controlPassword
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IP multicast is best-known for its bandwidth conservation and lower resource utilization. The classical multicast model makes it impossible to restrict access to authorized End Users (EU) or paying receivers and to forward data originated by an authorized sender(s) only. Without an effective participant (i.e., receivers and sender(s)) access control, an adversary may exploit the existing IP multicast model, where a host can join or send any multicast group without prior authentication and authorization. The Authentication, Authorization and Accounting (AAA) protocols are being used successfully, in unicast communication, to control access to network resources. AAA protocols can be used for multicast applications in a similar way. In this thesis, a novel architecture is presented for the use of AAA protocols to manage IP multicast group access control, which enforces authentication, authorization and accounting of group participants. The AAA framework has been deployed by implementing the Network Access Server (NAS) functionalities inside the Access Router (AR). The proposed architecture relates access control with e-commerce communications and policy enforcement. The Internet Group Management Protocol with Access Control (IGMP-AC), an extended version of the IGMPv3, has been developed for receiver access control. The IGMP-AC, which encapsulates Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) packets, has been modeled in PROMELA, and has also been verified using SPIN. Finally, the security properties of an EAP method, EAP Internet Key Exchange, have been validated using AVISPA. Protocol for Carrying Authentication for Network Access, a link-layer agnostic protocol that encapsulates EAP packets, has been deployed to authenticate a sender that establishes an IPsec Security Association between the sender and the AR to cryptographically authenticate each packet. Next, a policy framework has been designed for specifying and enforcing the access control policy for multicast group participants. The access control architecture has been extended to support inter-domain multicast groups by deploying Diameter agents that discover network entities located in remote domains and securely transport inter-domain AAA information. Furthermore, the inter-domain data distribution tree has been protected from several attacks generated by a compromised network entity (e.g., router, host) by deploying a Multicast Security Association. Finally, the scope of receiver access control architecture and IGMP-AC has been broadened by demonstrating the usability of IGMP-AC in wireless networks for mobile receiver (or EU) access control. In addition, using the EAP Re-authentication Protocol (ERP), a secured and fast handoff procedure of mobile EUs in wireless networks has been developed

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.903
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.113
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpectrum Research Repository (Concordia University)Same topicAccess Control and TrustFrench-language works237,207