Tekeni-Two Worlds, Many Borders: A Look at Classical Native Music through Indigenous Eyes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans cet article, j'aborde diverses oeuvres creees par des compositeurs classiques amerindiens qui invitent a repenser les dichotomies entre classique et traditionnel, oral et ecrit, amerindien et europeen, autochtone et colonial, et qui permettent de contribuer aux discussions en cours sur la facon dont la recherche universitaire peut refleter les savoirs autochotones tout en incorporant des theories et des choix stylistiques utilises par certains ethnomusicologues modernes afin de retablir et de refleter le point de vue autochtone. Partant du concept de gemellite emprunte au recit de la creation mohawk ainsi que des travaux sur la complementarite et la dualite menes par les ethnomusicologues Diamond, Cronk, von Rosen et Browner, j’elargis cette metaphore a l’aide des contributions des Deloria, de Little Bear, Smith et Wilson afin d’examiner comment negocier les frontieres entre la recherche autochtone et empirique, entre les theories anciennes et nouvelles, et entre les concepts classiques et autochtones tels qu’ils sont reveles dans les oeuvres elles-memes.Cet article utilise la recherche de terrain, l’analyse et les questionnaires pour aborder la question des frontieres musicales refletees dans la musique contemporaine ameriendienne, en etudiant les oeuvres et des idees des compositeurs Chacon (Navajo Dine), Archambault (Kichespirini), Nakai (Navajo/Ute), Davids (Mohican) et Quincy (Choctaw). De surcroit, je porte un regard reflexif sur mes propres compositions et mes interpretations musicales en tant qu’ethnomusicologue, interprete et une compositrice d’ascendance mohawk.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".