BRASIL E CANADÁ: PIONEIROS NA DIPLOMACIA MULTICULTURAL PARA ALÉM DE DIVISÕES IDEOLÓGICAS.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A diplomacia multicultural é um conceito que surgiu a partir da crescente mobilidade cultural originada da descolonização européia após a Segunda Guerra Mundial. É compreendida como conjunto de políticas que atores e a ação do Estado formulam para compreender populações, regiões, sociedades e nações e suas diferenças e complementaridades. Visa a apoiar a construção de políticas inovadoras na cooperação e maiores integrações internacionais, a partir do conhecimento de potencialidades dos diversos agentes, proporcionando-lhes maior inclusão e reconhecimento. O conceito só começou a ser levado em consideração após intervenções decisivas de Brasil e Canadá, pelas lideranças de Oswaldo Aranha e Lester Pearson. Após a Segunda Guerra Mundial, ambos criariam doutrinas amplas e duradouras para as Relações Exteriores de seus respectivos países e as projetariam à cena internacional. Tiveram influência preponderante na proposta de alternativas a conflitos culturais e étnicos baseados em escalas de força e confrontações – sugerindo horizontes mais amplos a um mundo que se guiava para concentração crescente de superpoderes e divisões ideológicas. Abstract: The multicultural diplomacy is a concept that emerged from enhanced cultural mobility of European decolonization after the Second World War. It is understood as a policy-pattern that included actors and the State-action to shape comprehension about populations, regions, societies and Nations – their differences and complementarities. These policies support innovative construction of cooperation and international integrations, since the knowledge about diverse agents can motivate better inclusion and recognition. This concept was only taken under consideration after decisive interventions of Brazil and Canada, through the leaderships of Oswaldo Aranha and Lester Pearson. After the Second World War, both leaders created further doctrines to Foreign Relations of their countries and projected them to international scene. They had decisive influence in purposing an alternative to cultural and ethnic conflicts based on force-scales and confrontations. Both suggested wider horizons to a world that was growing toward concentration of superpowers and ideological divisions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".