MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1580920155 · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2009.184051

Influence of high altitude on cerebrovascular and ventilatory responsiveness to CO <sub>2</sub>

2009· article· en· W1580920155 on OpenAlexaff
Jui‐Lin Fan, Keith R. Burgess, Riche Basnyat, Kate N. Thomas, Karen C. Peebles, Samuel J. E. Lucas, Rebekah A. I. Lucas, Joseph E. Donnelly, James D. Cotter, Philip N. Ainslie

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physiology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHigh Altitude and Hypoxia
Canadian institutionsOkanagan University CollegeUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNepal Academy of Science and TechnologyCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueOtago Medical Research Foundation
KeywordsHypercapniaEffects of high altitude on humansBicarbonateHypocapniaCerebral blood flowHypoxic ventilatory responseAcid–base homeostasisInternal medicineArterial bloodAltitude (triangle)Reactivity (psychology)Middle cerebral arteryVentilation (architecture)ChemistryAnesthesiaCardiologyMedicineRespiratory systemIschemiaAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An altered acid-base balance following ascent to high altitude has been well established. Such changes in pH buffering could potentially account for the observed increase in ventilatory CO(2) sensitivity at high altitude. Likewise, if [H(+)] is the main determinant of cerebrovascular tone, then an alteration in pH buffering may also enhance the cerebral blood flow (CBF) responsiveness to CO(2) (termed cerebrovascular CO(2) reactivity). However, the effect altered acid-base balance associated with high altitude ascent on cerebrovascular and ventilatory responsiveness to CO(2) remains unclear. We measured ventilation , middle cerebral artery velocity (MCAv; index of CBF) and arterial blood gases at sea level and following ascent to 5050 m in 17 healthy participants during modified hyperoxic rebreathing. At 5050 m, resting , MCAv and pH were higher (P < 0.01), while bicarbonate concentration and partial pressures of arterial O(2) and CO(2) were lower (P < 0.01) compared to sea level. Ascent to 5050 m also increased the hypercapnic MCAv CO(2) reactivity (2.9 +/- 1.1 vs. 4.8 +/- 1.4% mmHg(1); P < 0.01) and CO(2) sensitivity (3.6 +/- 2.3 vs. 5.1 +/- 1.7 l min(1) mmHg(1); P < 0.01). Likewise, the hypocapnic MCAv CO(2) reactivity was increased at 5050 m (4.2 +/- 1.0 vs. 2.0 +/- 0.6% mmHg(1); P < 0.01). The hypercapnic MCAv CO(2) reactivity correlated with resting pH at high altitude (R(2) = 0.4; P < 0.01) while the central chemoreflex threshold correlated with bicarbonate concentration (R(2) = 0.7; P < 0.01). These findings indicate that (1) ascent to high altitude increases the ventilatory CO(2) sensitivity and elevates the cerebrovascular responsiveness to hypercapnia and hypocapnia, and (2) alterations in cerebrovascular CO(2) reactivity and central chemoreflex may be partly attributed to an acid-base balance associated with high altitude ascent. Collectively, our findings provide new insights into the influence of high altitude on cerebrovascular function and highlight the potential role of alterations in acid-base balance in the regulation in CBF and ventilatory control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.298
Threshold uncertainty score0.278

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations84
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of PhysiologySame topicHigh Altitude and HypoxiaFrench-language works237,207