MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1580936325

The Four Seasons and the Accusative-Locative Opposition in Polish

2013· article· en· W1580936325 on OpenAlex
Barbara Bacz

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Macrodynamic Analysis (Memorial University of Newfoundland) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLanguage and Culture
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdverbialLinguisticsHistoryContext (archaeology)Philosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It sometimes appears that the very possibility of a given case usage depends on the lexical content of the declined nominal.For instance, in Polish the prepositionless instrumental can easily mark the time substantive noc 'night' in sentences such as Przyszli nocQ 'They came at/by night-INsTSG' or Pracuje nocami 'He works at night-'NsTPL' but it is impossible to find it on the substantive dzien 'day' in the same or similar context.When used in an adverbial of time, the instrumental form of dzien occurs only in some set phrases, such as dzien za dniem 'day in, day out-INST SG' or dniami i nocami 'days-INsT PL and nights'.Confronted with certain case uses in Slavic, linguists have often been forced to conclude that it is virtually impossible to separate the grammatical meaning of a case from the lexical content of the case-marked nominal.Commenting on the meaning of the Russian instrumental in his 1936 classic 'Beitrag zur allgemeinen Kasuslehre', Jakobson (1936 [1990: 357]) states, supporting his observation with examples taken from the poetry of Majakovskij, that 'everything other than peripheral status is given in in-Sciences Humaines, 45-50.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.181
Threshold uncertainty score0.967

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it