MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W158138598

Sediment Discharge in Yukon River, Alaska : Its Continuous Measurement and Interpretation

2000· article· en· W158138598 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kazuhisa Chikita, Ryuji Kumai, R.T. Kemnitz

Bibliographic record

VenueHokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers (Hokkaido University) · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHokkaido UniversityMassachusetts Department of Fish and Game
KeywordsSedimentInterpretation (philosophy)Hydrology (agriculture)GeologyDischargeEnvironmental scienceGeomorphologyGeotechnical engineeringGeographyDrainage basinCartographyComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to clarify the mechanism of sediment discharge in Yukon River, Alaska, continuous measurements of turbidity and temperature of river water were performed at a site in the middle region of the drainage basin for a period of June to September 1998.Water turbidity recorded at a fixed point represents the crosssectional fluctuation of suspended sediment concentration (SSC) with an error of less than 20 mg/L, exhibiting a one-to-one correspondence between turbidity and SSe.A time series of sediment discharge, the product of sse and water discharge, was obtained using the turbidity record and water discharge data of U.S. Geological Survey.Sediment discharge of Yukon River seasonally varies with high water discharge and high SSC by snowmelt until early July and subsequently with relatively low water discharge and very high sse by glacier-melt and rainfall through early September.The snowmelt sediment discharge is probably due to fluvial entrainment of bank sediment in the upstream.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.273
Threshold uncertainty score0.963

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers (Hokkaido University)Same topicHydrology and Watershed Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207