MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1581574282 · doi:10.1071/rdv16n1ab254

254 IDENTIFICATION OF OOCYTE SPECIFIC GENES USING SSH ANDMICROARRAY ANALYSIS

2004· article· en· W1581574282 on OpenAlexaff
Maud Vallée, Catherine Gravel, Marie‐France Palin, Marc‐André Sirard

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComplementary DNAReproductive technologyBiologyGerminal vesicleMolecular biologyOocyteZona pellucidaOogenesisTransgenesisGeneticsGeneEmbryoEmbryogenesis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main objective of this project was to isolate and identify important genes specifically expressed in oocytes. These genes are characterized and may uncover the molecular mechanisms related to the unique functions found in the oocyte. Total RNA (1 µg) from denuded germinal vesicle-stage (GV) oocytes and somatic tissues were used for cDNA production. The mRNAs were reverse-transcribed and the cDNAs were amplified using the Smart cDNA amplification kit (Clontech, BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). SSH was performed with the PCR-Select cDNA Subtraction Kit (Clontech). Briefly, pools consisted of bovine oocytes for the tester and bovine somatic tissues for the driver. The same procedure was repeated with mouse and xenopus tissues. All of the 3500 subtracted PCR products generated by SSH were cloned, PCR amplified and sequenced. The resulting sequences were compared against the GenBank database using online computer BLASTn program. For microarray analysis, purified PCR products were spotted on GAPS II glass slides (Corning, Corning, NY, USA) using a VersArray Chip WriterPro robot (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA). Forward- and reverse-subtracted PCR products were used as probes labeled with Cy-3 and Cy-5 dyes (Amersham, Piscataway, NJ, USA) using the Amino Allyle cDNA Labeling Kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA). Slides were scanned and analyzed using the ChipReader and ArrayPro Analyser software (Media Cybernetics, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Detection of the oocyte-specific zona pellucida (ZP), growth differentiation factor-9 (GDF-9), bone morphogenetic protein 15 (BMP15), H1 histone family, member O, oocyte-specific (H1oo), and cyclin B1 transcript in the oocyte subtracted library increased confidence in the validity of the subtraction procedure. All of these transcripts account for 12 % of the clones for the mouse subtracted oocyte library. Microarray analysis performed with the mouse arrays revealed that 33% (382) of the clones were differentially expressed (ratio > 10) in the oocyte for the mouse library. Of the 139 clones (12%) that seemed to be present only in the oocyte, 65 were found to be expressed in both the bovine and the xenopus subtracted oocyte library. The most interesting clones to date are #1518, a gene associated with pluripotency;; #1776, a cDNA associated with stem cells in mouse, and #1906, a protein that interacts with chromatin. Since they are conserved across species, the chances that their function is important are quite high. A validation step with RT-PCR analysis will need to be performed on genes identified as oocyte-specific, and the functionality of these genes will be determined with the RNAi technique. WEB page http://www.begc.crbr.ulaval.ca/ (Supported by NSERC).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.361
Threshold uncertainty score0.523

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207