MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W158218124 · doi:10.1093/pch/19.10.515

A novel MC4R mutation associated with childhood-onset obesity: A case report

2014· article· en· W158218124 on OpenAlexaff
Manpreet Doulla, Adam D. McIntyre, Robert A. Hegele, Patricia Gallego

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicRegulation of Appetite and Obesity
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompound heterozygosityGeneticsExonBiologyHyperinsulinemiaEndocrinologyInternal medicineMutationMelanocortin 4 receptorHeterozygote advantageObesityLeptinLoss of heterozygosityAlleleGeneMedicineReceptorMelanocortinInsulin resistance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The melanocortin-4-receptor gene (MC4R) is a key regulator of energy homeostasis, food intake and body weight. MC4R gene mutations are associated with early-onset severe obesity. Most patients are heterozygotes, with some reports of homozygotes and compound heterozygotes. The authors report a case involving an eight-year-old girl with progressive weight gain from infancy, body mass index 44 kg/m(2) (>97th percentile), hyperphagia, hyperinsulinemia and increased linear growth. There was no phenotype of morbid obesity in the parents or sibling. Coding regions and intron-exon boundaries of the genes encoding leptin, leptin receptor, pro-opiomelanocortin and MC4R were analyzed. Two heterozygous coding mutations in the MCR4 gene (S94N and C293R) were detected, of which the second has not been previously reported. The mutations were on opposite chromosomes, confirming compound heterozygosity. The molecular findings and clinical features associated with this novel MC4R mutation are described. The authors emphasize that rare mutations can be found in some patients with severe childhood-onset obesity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.151
Threshold uncertainty score0.883

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations65
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child HealthSame topicRegulation of Appetite and ObesityFrench-language works237,207