MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1582466872 · doi:10.4271/2009-01-3136

Aircraft Level Steering Runaway Failure Analysis

2009· article· en· W1582466872 on OpenAlexaff
Phillip Wang, L. Dacko, Nicolas Keller, Jiangning Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsSafran Electronics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceAeronauticsReliability engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<div class="htmlview paragraph">Integration of aircraft landing gear systems requires a high level of knowledge and understanding of these systems and how they contribute to aircraft performance. This paper considers a specific design requirement for the steering system. Failure of the steering system, resulting in the aircraft leaving the runway at high speed, can be considered hazardous or even catastrophic. The ability of the system to detect such a failure and take appropriate action is a key aspect of the design. This paper describes an aircraft level steering runaway failure analysis using an aircraft level mechanical and hydraulic control coupled simulation model.</div> <div class="htmlview paragraph">The aircraft level simulation model includes aircraft structure, weight and inertia. Appropriate loads and forces (engine thrust, aerodynamic forces, lift, drag) and moments are then applied. The model also includes nose and main landing gears, brakes and tires. The steering system model includes all hydraulic and control components, with failure triggers and steering failure detection logic.</div> <div class="htmlview paragraph">The aircraft level steering runaway failure analysis is carried out under different aircraft operations (taxi speeds, weights) in order to identify the most severe condition. In this model, differential braking is applied to simulate a pilot corrective action after the failure is detected.</div> <div class="htmlview paragraph">The analysis results show that the aircraft level steering model is able to determine the aircraft landing gear deviation from the runway centerline under failure conditions, with and without pilot corrective actions, and to assess the pilot reaction time required to bring the aircraft back to its runway centerline after the failure occurs.</div> <div class="htmlview paragraph">This analysis can be performed during early design stage to evaluate steering system sizing and other performance characteristics and the particular dynamic characteristics of the steering controller.</div> <div class="htmlview paragraph">This paper is addressed to the landing gear system performance specialists, who analyze similar conditions, to allow comparison of methods and results.</div>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.972
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper seriesSame topicVehicle Dynamics and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207