Autosuffisance céréalière et sécurité alimentaire en Inde : une mise ne perspective historique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La securite alimentaire de l'Inde depend de l'autosuffisance cerealiere. Mais suite a la liberalisation de l'economie, cet acquis pourrait etre remis en cause. Dans une perspective historique, il apparait ainsi que le dispositif de soutien a la production et a la consommation que l'on veut aujourd'hui demanteler joua un role determinant dans l'accession a l'autosuffisance ceraliere. Il permit de palier aux inegalites sociales et regionales de la revolution verte, notamment du point de vue de leurs effets depressifs sur les revenus agricoles et la demande alimentaire, donc sur les prix agricoles. Mais cette politique a ses limites, comme le montre les stocks cerealiers eleves alors qu'une partie de la population reste dans une situation alimentaire precaire et que l'autre, aisee, diversifie sa consommation alimentaire. En cas de retrait de l'Etat, cette configuration pourrait alors s'opposer a la preservation de l'autosuffisance cerealiere et de la securite alimentaire de l'Inde.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".