MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1582824580 · doi:10.1002/ejhf.23

Effect of Comorbidities on Outcomes and Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor Effects in Patients with Predominantly Left Ventricular Dysfunction and Heart Failure

2014· article· en· W1582824580 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Böhm, Janice Pogue, Ingrid Kindermann, Janine Pöss, Salim Yusuf

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Heart Failure · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart Failure Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityPopulation Health Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHeart failureEnalaprilAsymptomaticInternal medicineCardiologyComorbidityDiabetes mellitusACE inhibitorEjection fractionAnginaAngiotensin-converting enzymeMyocardial infarctionBlood pressureEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIMS: Comorbidities are frequent in heart failure and impact outcomes. It is not known whether comorbidities are associated with outcomes in asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction compared to clinical heart failure and whether comorbidities interfere with treatment effects. Our objective was to assess comorbidities and their effects on outcomes in predominantly asymptomatic populations without previous heart failure treatment of the SOLVD prevention trial, compared to symptomatic heart failure patients of SOLVD treatment and to evaluate associations to the effect of enalapril. METHODS AND RESULTS: This post hoc analysis from the SOLVD prevention and SOLVD treatment trials includes 4228 patients with left ventricular dysfunction and 2569 patients with heart failure. The preexisting comorbidities hypertension, diabetes mellitus, pulmonary disease, angina pectoris, renal impairment, and anaemia were similar in SOLVD treatment and SOLVD prevention, with a higher prevalence in SOLVD treatment. Comorbidities are significantly associated with the primary composite of SOLVD time to death or heart failure hospitalization (SOLVD prevention: HR 4.8, CI: 3.2-7.18, P < 0.0001; SOLVD treatment: HR 2.9, CI: 2.12-3.95, P < 0.0001 for more than four comorbidities vs. no comorbidities), and to death, heart failure hospitalization, and cardiovascular death where the effect of the number of coexisting comorbidities was additive. There was no significant interaction of comorbidities with treatment effects of enalapril. CONCLUSION: Comorbidities increased events in asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction and in symptomatic heart failure, but did not interfere with the effects of enalapril. Comorbidities need to be adequately addressed in clinical trials, which should also involve non-cardiac treatments in order to improve outcome for heart failure patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Heart FailureSame topicHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207