Resistance to <i>Wheat streak mosaic virus</i> – a survey of resources and development of molecular markers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wheat streak mosaic virus (WSMV) has been newly documented in Australia. The vulnerability of contemporary Australian elite wheat germplasm prompted a survey for effective resistance against an Australian isolate, WSMV‐ACT. This study confirms the effectiveness of previously reported sources of resistance and shows that new sources of resistance also confer protection. The resistance derived from Thinopyrum intermedium ( Wsm1 ) as a 4D translocation and a new 4A translocation, and two bread wheat resistances, Wsm2 and the new source c2652, were effective against WSMV‐ACT in glasshouse experiments. Wsm1 was effective at lower temperatures but ineffective above 20°C, a temperature sensitivity shared with many of the derivatives of Wsm2 except for one new selection which was effective at 26°C. True wheats c2652 and Wsm2 selection CA745, and amphiploids Zhong1, Zhong2, Zhong4, Zhong5, TAF46, Summer1, Ot38 and OK7211542 were uniformly resistant at 20, 25 and 28°C. New sources of resistance were identified in a Th. scirpeum ‐wheat amphiploid, B84‐994, and in chromosome addition lines Z2, Z6 and TAi27, derived from wheat‐ Th. intermedium partial amphiploids. Several new, tightly linked SSR, RAPD and EST‐ILP PCR markers were developed for tracking the various Th. intermedium translocations associated with Wsm1, including the smaller translocations on wheat chromosome 4AS and 4DS. Three markers for the 4A‐ Wsm1 translocation were validated on a segregating breeding population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".