MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Impact of a human missense UCP3 polymorphism on the plasma metabolomic profile: support for a mitochondrial fuel‐partitioning role for UCP3 (248.4)

2014· article· en· W1582982775 on OpenAlexaff
Brian D. Piccolo, Dmitry Grapov, W. Timothy Garvey, Mary‐Ellen Harper, Oliver Fiehn, Sean H. Adams, John W. Newman

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdipose Tissue and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUCP3Uncoupling proteinSkeletal muscleMetabolomicsOxidative phosphorylationBiologyBiochemistryMitochondrial biogenesisGlutathioneReactive oxygen speciesMitochondrionEndocrinologyChemistryInternal medicineBioinformaticsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Skeletal muscle uncoupling protein 3 (UCP3) is thought to facilitate fatty acid oxidation (FAO) and protect against excess mitochondrial (MITO) reactive oxygen species (ROS); however, this has yet to be conclusively proven in human studies. We hypothesized that a comprehensive plasma metabolomic characterization of a human UCP3 polymorphism would identify metabolites associated with decreased skeletal muscle FAO and oxidative stress. We measured 490 metabolites using three independent metabolomics platforms in obese African‐American women with or without type 2 diabetes (T2D) containing a missense G304A (G/A) UCP3 polymorphism. Partial least squares‐discriminant analysis (PLS‐DA) revealed altered amino acid profiles and metabolites consistent with enhanced glycolytic oxidation in the context of reduced UCP3 function. UCP3 G/A genotype also revealed decreases in plasma amino acids involved in glutathione metabolism and markers of glutathione synthesis. Stearoylethanolamide (SEA), a putative modulator of MITO oxidative phosphorylation and biogenesis was also significantly elevated in T2D UCP3 G/A individuals. Our results support the idea that UCP3 is involved in regulating muscle MITO fuel selection by promoting fatty acid combustion, perhaps via mechanisms involving ROS signaling. Grant Funding Source : Supported by: NIH‐NIDDK R01DK078328‐01, UAB‐CCTS UL1 RR025777, WCMC NIH 1 U24 DK097154, USDA‐ARS

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicAdipose Tissue and Metabolism→French-language works237,207→