MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Endochondral bone tissue engineering: using cartilage to drive vascularized bone regeneration (87.6)

2014· article· en· W1583161388 on OpenAlexaff
Chelsea S. Bahney, Amit K. Jha, Diane Hu, Aaron Taylor, Hayley M. Britz, Benedikt Hallgrímsson, Ted Miclau, Ralph Marcucio

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPeriodontal Regeneration and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsEndochondral ossificationCartilageTissue engineeringBone healingBiomedical engineeringRegeneration (biology)Bone cellChemistryMedicineAnatomyCell biologyBiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is a significant unmet clinical need to develop improved strategies to promote vascularized bone regeneration. Current bone graft technologies promote repair through direct osteogenesis by use of auto‐ or allografted bone. Critical failures associated with these therapies include osteonecrosis and poor osseointegration. The long‐term goal of this project is to develop a tissue engineering approach to promote endochondral bone formation, in which bone forms through a cartilage intermediate. Endochondral ossification is the normal mechanism by which long bones form and the majority of fractures heal. By leveraging this normal healing response, we hypothesize we can overcome the clinical problems of osteonecrosis and poor integration to produce a vascularized and integrated bone regenerate. To test this hypothesis, critical sized defects were created in mid‐diaphysis of murine tibia. Defects remained empty, or were filled with a cartilage graft, autograft or allograft bone. Our data show cartilage grafts effectively transformed into vascularized bone and integrated with the host bone to perform statistically better than allografts and equivalent to autografts. To translate this therapy we have developed a biomimetic acrylated hyaluronic acid hydrogel that contains peptide sequences for cell attachment (bone sialoprotein‐derived RGD), heparin for modulation and sequestration of growth factors, and enzymatically degradable MMP‐13 crosslinks. Hypertrophic chondrocytes encapsulated in these scaffolds mineralization during in vitro culture in basal medium. In ongoing work, these scaffolds have been transplanted into a subcutaneous model of osteonecrosis to evaluate the capacity to re‐vitalize bone. This novel approach to bone tissue engineering has the potential to improve clinical outcomes in bone regeneration. Grant Funding Source : Supported by NIH 5F32AR062469 (CSB), MTF Junior Investigator Award (CSB), UCSF CTSI Award (CSB)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicPeriodontal Regeneration and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207