Bibliographic record
Abstract
PRI, which was in power for 71 years, had been the most powerful party in Mexico. However, it was defeated by AC, the union of PAN and PVEM, in 2000 election. The firm position of a party in power is based on its social foundation that relies on its abilities to mobilize and control over society. The rising and declining experiences of PRI show that the party in power must have the abilities of forming and strengthening ideological condensation, tr ansforming system, adjusting policy as well as coordinating and condensing the varied interests of society, then can it make itself remain invincible. Key words: PRI, ideological condensation, transforming system, policy ability,coordinating interests Resume: PRI, qui a ete au pouvoir pendant 71 ans, a ete le plus puissant parti au Mexique. Toutefois, il a ete defait par AC, l'union de PAN et PVEM, dans l’election en 2000. Que la position solide d'un parti au pouvoir est basee sur sa fondation sociale repose sur ses capacites a mobiliser et a controler la societe. Les experiences de prosperite et decadence de PRI montrent que le parti au pouvoir doit avoir la capacite de former et renforcer la condensation ideologique, de transformer le systeme, d'adapter la politique ainsi que de coordiner et condenser de divers interets de la societe, ainsi peut-il se faire rester invincible. Mots-Cles: PRI, condensation ideologique, transformer le systeme, capacite politique, coordiner les interets
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".