L'insertion des immigrants en milieu régional et la variation de leur motivation en regard de leur établissement définitif
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La présente recherche parle de l'insertion des immigrants en Abitibi-Témiscamingue et de leur \nparcours migratoire. Ceux-ci se déplacent parce qu'ils ont des rêves (source motivationnelle) et des \nmotifs précis pour le faire. Ils rêvent d'une vie de famille et/ ou d'améliorer leur qualité de vie \nprofessionnelle et/ ou personnelle. Six phases de rêves (source motivationnelle) et de réalisation \npersonmelle ont été détectées. Elles indiquent où en est l'immigrant dans son parcours migratoire et \npermet de déceler ce qui peut favoriser ou nuire à son insertion. II importe de saisir ce qui le motive \nou le démotive et de comprendre ce qui fait varier sa motivation depuis le départ du pays d'origine \njusqu'à son insertion en milieu Témiscabitibien. \nChez les immigrants, il y a une source motivationnelle qui provoque une mise en action et celle-ci est \naccompagnée de motifs. Cette source motivationnelle ne change pas mais la façon d'y répondre peut \nêtre réajustée selon les besoins et les conditions d'insertion vécues. L'acte d'immnigration a été analysé \nselon quatre aspects spécifiques de la motivation : le déclenchement, l'intensité, la direction et la \npersistance du comportement. La motivation peut varier selon trois positions : intrinsèque, extrinsèque \nou démotivation. II apparaît aussi que la motivation varie en hausse ou en baisse sous l'influence de \nfacteurs favorables et/ ou défavorables mais il faut aussi tenir compte des forces internes de chaque \npersonne (attitude, personnalité, philosophie de vie). \nAu niveau méthodologique, les outils de recherche sont de deux ordres. Premièrement, un \nquestionnaire administré servait à relever les principales données socio-démographiques. \nDeuxièmement, des entrevues semi-dirigées permettaient de détecter la source motivationnelle, de \nconnaître les motifs pour venir au Québec, d'identifier la variation de la motivation tant au niveau \nobjectif qu'au niveau subjectif. Plusieurs types d'insertion ont été abordés : linguistique, culturelle, \néconomique, professionnelle, sociale et l'insertion dans l'environnement physique. Pour cette \nrecherche exploratoire vingt immigrants ont été rencontrés en Abitibi-Témiscamingue. \nThis research is about the insertion of the immigrants in Abitibi-Témiscamingue and their migratory \nventure. They move because they have dreams (motivational source) and specifie motives to do so. \nThey dream of an ideal family life and/or of improving the quality of their professional and/or \npersonal life. Six stages of fulfilment of the dream have been detected. They indicate where the \nimmigrant stands in his life project and allows us to detect which factors can help or harm his \ninsertion. It is important to understand what motivates or demotivates him and to understand what \nmakes this motivation change over time, starting with the departure from the original country up to the \ninsertion in the Temiscabitibian enviromnent. \nFor the immigrants, there is a motivational source that provokes the migration and it is supported by \nmotives. This motivational source does not change over time, but the way it is fulfilled may be \nreadjusted according to the needs and the conditions of the actual insertion. The act of immigration \nhas been analysed according to four specifie aspects of motivation : the triggering, the intensity, the \ndirection and the persistence of the behaviour. The motivation can vary according three positions : \nintrinsic, extrinsic and demotivation. It appears the motivation increases or decreases depending not \nonly on favourable or unfavourable factors, but also on the internal strength of every person (attitude, \npersonality, philosophy of life). \nAs for the methodology, two kinds of research tools were used. Firstly, a questiollllaire was \nadministered to gather socio-demographic data. Secondly, semi-directed interviews were done to \ndetemine the motivational source, to know the reasons why they came in Quebec, and to identify the \nvariation of the motivation, both at the objective and subjective levels. During the interviews, many \nkinds of insertion were covered : linguistic, cultural, economie, professional, social and in the physical \nenvironment. For the purpose of this exploratory research, 20 immigrants were interviewed in Abitibi-Témiscamingue.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".