MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1583809851 · doi:10.1071/rdv16n1ab14

14 OVARIAN FOLLICULAR DYNAMICS IN COWS TREATED WITH A CIDR, ESTRADIOL AND PROGESTERONE LATE IN THE ESTROUS CYCLE

2004· article· en· W1583809851 on OpenAlex
John P. Kastelic, M.G. Colazo, J. A. Small, D. R. Ward, R.J. Mapletoft

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicReproductive Physiology in Livestock
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEstrous cycleOvulationFollicular phaseAnimal scienceFollicleInternal medicineEndocrinologyMedicineAndrologyBiologyHormone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective was to characterize ovarian follicular dynamics in beef cows treated with a CIDR (Bioniche Animal Health; Belleville, Ontario, Canada) and an injection of estradiol-17ß (E2), with or without progesterone (P4), late in the estrous cycle. Previously synchronized, non-lactating, crossbred beef cows (n = 36) received a CIDR (Day 0) 16 to 18 days after ovulation and were randomly allocated to one of three treatment groups: no further treatment (Control, n = 12), an injection of 5 mg E2 (E2, n = 12), or 5 mg E2 plus 100 mg P4 (E2P4, n = 12; both from Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) i.m. in 2 mL canola oil. On Day 7, CIDR were removed and cows received 500 µg i.m. of cloprostenol (Estrumate, Schering Plough Animal Health, Pointe-Claire, Quebec, Canada). Ovaries were examined once daily by transrectal ultrasonography to detect ovarian follicle growth profiles, and determine the time of ovulation. Blood samples were taken daily for progesterone determination. Data were analyzed by ANOVA (LSD and Bartlett’s tests), Student’s t-test and chi-square procedures. Diameter of the CL and the dominant follicle, and progesterone concentration on Day 0 did not differ among groups (P = 0.6; overall mean (±SD), 16.8 ± 2.7 mm, 14.1 ± 2.0 mm, and 1.5 ± 1.9 ng mL, respectively). Thirteen cows ovulated within 3 days of treatment (50% of E2- and E2P4-treated cows and 8.3% of Control cows; P = 0.05); cows that ovulated had smaller CL diameters (15.2 ± 1.7 v. 17.7 ± 2.7 mm; P < 0.004) and lower progesterone concentrations (0.4 ± 0.2 v.2.1 ± 2.2 ng mL; P < 0.001) at the time of treatment. Follicular wave emergence occurred within 7 days in 4/12 Control cows, 10/12 E2-treated cows, and 10/12 E2P4-treated cows (P < 0.01). Although the interval from treatment to wave emergence did not differ among treatments (P = 0.8; overall, 3.4 ± 1.5 days), follicular wave emergence was more synchronous (P < 0.004) in the E2 group than in the Control or E2P4 groups. At CIDR removal, dominant follicle diameter was larger (P < 0.02) in the Control group (15.9 ± 5.5 mm) than in the E2 (11.9 ± 1.8 mm) or E2P4 (11.5 ± 3.4 mm)groups, but dominant follicle diameter was less variable (P < 0.003) in the E2 group than in the other two groups. Three cows did not ovulate after CIDR removal; two in the Control group and one in the E2P4 group. Interval to ovulation was shorter (P < 0.05) in the Control group (70.8 ± 10.5 h)than in the E2 (87.0 ± 9.0 h) or E2P4 (86.2 ± 7.2 h) groups, and the intervals to ovulation in cows that ovulated following treatment (91.0 ± 8.0 h) was longer (P < 0.001) than in those that did not (76.6 ± 9.6 h). In summary, treatment of cows with an estradiol-progesterone protocol late in the estrous cycle resulted in ovulation (50.0%), atresia (33.3%) or persistence (16.6%) of the dominant follicle present at that time. As length of follicular dominance and timing of ovulation were affected, fertility may be impaired following AI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.128
Threshold uncertainty score0.226

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it