MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W158386257

La victimisation et les problèmes de comportement. Deux composantes de profils types de fugueurs adolescents

2004· article· fr· W158386257 on OpenAlexaff
Marie Robert, Louise Fournier, Robert Pauzé

Bibliographic record

VenueChild Abuse & Neglect · 2004
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHomelessness and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de Santé Publique du QuébecUniversité de SherbrookeUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPoison controlVictimisationPhilosophyMedicineInjury prevention
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Resume Objectif: Cette etude questionne la relation entre deux facteurs explicatifs de la fugue/itinerance chez les adolescents: les problemes de comportement des jeunes et la violence parentale qu’ils subissent. Elle demontre qu’il s’agit de deux facteurs distincts associes a des profils types de fugueurs. Methodologie: Les donnees ont ete collectees aupres de 130 adolescents (12 a 17 ans) qui ont connu des fugues courtes et repetitives. Deux groupes ont ete constitue: 79 jeunes qui ne presentent pas de problemes de comportement ( groupe A ) et 51 qui en manifestent ( groupe B ). Les deux groupes sont semblables quant a certaines caracteristiques de leur environnement familial (revenu familial, activite du parent, type de famille, stabilite familiale). Resultats: Les analyses bivariees revelent des differences significatives entre les deux groupes de fugueurs en ce qui concernent (1) le sexe; (2) le diagnostic de troubles des conduites; (3) l’affiliation a des personnes deviantes; et (4) la violence parentale qu’ils subissent. L’analyse discriminante montre que ces quatre variables distinguent nettement les deux groupes de fugueurs et predisent l’appartenance de groupe pour 82% des cas. Ainsi le groupe B a plus de chances d’avoir un diagnostic de troubles des conduites, d’etre de sexe masculin et de s’associer a des pairs delinquants. Ce groupe ne subit pas un niveau eleve de violence parentale. C’est tout a fait l’inverse qui caracterise le groupe A. Conclusion: Notre etude montre que la violence parentale et les troubles de comportements sont des variables associees respectivement a deux profils de fugueurs. Ainsi, ces variables ne constituent pas les composantes d’une dynamique unique susceptible d’expliquer la fugue, comme le pense certains auteurs. Nos resultats dissipent les doutes, quelque fois exprimes par les chercheurs quant a l’importance de la victimisation parentale chez les fugueurs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChild Abuse & NeglectSame topicHomelessness and Social IssuesFrench-language works237,207