Re-examining Contract and Unjust Enrichment: Anglo-Canadian Perspectives (
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Foreword Preface List of Contributors Table of Cases Table of Legislative Instruments Chapter 1 Diverging or Converging - The Ongoing Relationship of the Common Laws of England and Canada Paula Giliker Part 1: The Boundaries of Contract and Unjust Enrichment Chapter 2 The Relation Between Contract and Unjust Enrichment Stephen Waddams Chapter 3 Unjust Factors, Juristic Reasons and Contracts in Anglo-Canadian Law Mitchell McInnes Chapter 4 Mistake in Contract Law and in Unjust Enrichment Kate Bracegirdle Chapter 5 No Longer taken to be Cognisant of the Law? Mistake of Law in Contract and Restitution in Canada and England Catharine MacMillan Chapter 6 The Fiduciary Concept, Contract Law, and Unjust Enrichment: A Functional Comparison Leonard I. Rotman Chapter 7 Drafting an Irish Frustrated Contracts Act: Lessons from British Columbia Cliona Kelly Chapter 8 Once More unto the Breach: Remedies for the Non-Payment of Insurance Claims after Blake James Davey Chapter 9 Choice of Law for Void Contracts and their Restitutionary Aftermath: The Putative Governing Law of the Contract Adeline Chong Part 2: Clarifying the Law of Unjust Enrichment Chapter 10 Implied Contract and the Taxonomy of Unjust Enrichment Duncan Sheehan Chapter 11 Contract, Unjust Enrichment and Restitution: The Significance of Classification Peter Jaffey Part 3: Clarifying the Law of Contract Chapter 12 The Purpose of the Doctrine of Presumed Undue Infl uence Jesse Elvin Chapter 13 Awarding Damages for Distress and Loss of Reputation in England and Canada Jill Poole Part 4: Contract and Unjust Enrichment - Reconciling Different Jurisdictional Approaches Chapter 14 Specifi c Performance in the Common and Civil Law: Some Lessons for Harmonisation Lucinda Miller Chapter 15 'Compensation' and 'Indemnity' under the Agency Regulations: How the Common Law System Copes with the Invasion of Civilian Concepts Robert Bradgate and Severine Saintier Index
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.011 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.029 | 0.035 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.020 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".