Fatores associados à ocorrência de vibrações articulares
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objetivou-se neste trabalho verificar a associação do sexo, classe econômica, qualidade do sono e estresse com a ocorrência de vibrações articulares. A população deste estudo constituiu-se inicialmente por 160 indivíduos de ambos os sexos do município de Piacatu, São Paulo, Brasil, nos quais aplicou-se o Questionário de Fonseca, para verificar o grau de DTM. Posteriormente, os indivíduos com disfunção moderada e severa foram classificados economicamente por meio do Critério de Classificação Econômica Brasil (CCEB), responderam à tradução do Questionário de Avaliação do Sono de Toronto (SAQ) e a Escala de Reajustamento Social (SRRS), para verificar o grau de estresse. Realizou-se também exame eletrovibratográfico. Do total, 37 (23,1%) indivíduos apresentavam disfunção moderada ou severa, sendo que destes, 20 (54,1%) eram do sexo feminino, 21 (56,8%) pertenciam a “Classe D”, 29 (78,4%) apresentavam distúrbios do sono, 24 (64,8%) graus mais elevados de estresse e 19 (51,4%) vibração articular. Há associação estatisticamente significativa da qualidade do sono e classe econômica na ocorrência de vibrações articulares.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".