Research Progress on the Injury Mechanism and the Protective Effect of Blood-Brain Barrier
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Blood-Brain Barrier (BBB) is important structure to maintaining the stabilization of central nervous system.It is composed of endothelial cell and tight junction, the basal lamina, astrocytic endfeet.BBB's injuries is a important symbol when central nervous system generate lesion in cerebral ischemical reperfusion injury (CIRI), its' the injury mechanism including that matrix metalloproteinases' activity raise induce that basal lamina and extracellular matrix degradation, the augmentation of Aquaporin-4's expression cause vasogenic edema, destruction of tight junction and decrease of related protein expression lead to raise of BBB permeability, the adhesion molecules and cytokines stimulate the inflammatory reaction, a lot of free radicals production and nitric oxide toxicity can pose the damage of endothelial cells and basal lamina.BBB's protection mainly by reducing the change of BBB's morphological structure; decreasing BBB's permeability; reducing the harmful substances go into BBB; maintaining stabilize of central nervous system's internal environment.Now the mechanism was constantly expounded that BBB's injury, adjustment and repair, more and more medicines will be applied to the prevention and treatment of the BBB.In this paper, we will review about research progress on the injury mechanism of BBB and the protective effect of it.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".