MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1585331892

La movilización de los recursos humanos: una fuerza colectiva basada en relaciones de reciprocidad

2005· article· es· W1585331892 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAcademia-revista Latinoamericana De Administracion · 2005
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicOrganizational Management and Innovation
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à MontréalHEC Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este articulo presenta el modelo de la movilizacion de los recursos humanos, las condiciones sicologicas favorables para su aparicion y los principales incentivos con los que la organizacion puede influir para estimular su desarrollo. Se define el concepto de movilizacion y se presentan en detalle cada una de las cuatro familias de comportamientos de movilizacion (motivacion, colaboracion, agente de cambio y lealtad). Asi mismo se presentan siete condiciones sicologicas (confianza, apoyo, justicia, empowerment, reconocimiento, compromiso y motivacion) y las relaciones entre ellas y con los comportamientos de movilizacion. Este texto es fruto de reflexiones teoricas y de trabajos empiricos realizados de manera individual o en conjunto. Ademas se ha usado en intervenciones en organizaciones grandes que han adoptado este modelo en su gestion de recursos humanos, lo que ha permitido examinarlo como un instrumento de desarrollo organizacional.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.716
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it