MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1585446118

Public Spectacles, Private Narratives: Canadian Heritage Campaigns, Maternal Trauma and the Rise of the Koffort (trunk) in Icelandic-Canadian Popular Memory

2010· article· en· W1585446118 on OpenAlexaffabout
Laurie K. Bertram

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterial Culture Review / Revue de la culture matérielle · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIsland Studies and Pacific Affairs
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIcelandicHistoryNarrativeEthnologyHistorical traumaGender studiesHumanitiesGenealogySociologyArtLiteraturePsychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The late rise of the previously undervalued migrant trunk, or koffort within Icelandic-Canadian popular culture is easily linked to the proliferation of migration-focused visual heritage campaigns in Canada from 1967 onwards. This corresponding re-emergence in local art and museums, as well as in family homes, suggests that Icelandic-Canadians have simply adopted the static, celebratory image of migration history set forth by the state. However, by using interviews and photographs detailing the mnemonic uses of these objects in private, this article contends that the trunk is a hybrid object that offers families archives and points of contact for histories of trauma that also draw from traditional Icelandic notions of fatalism and matrilineal systems of identification. Despite its redemptive public image, the trunk is often the vehicle through which are revealed female-centred narratives of migrant trauma—spousal abuse, widowhood and infant mortality. Rather than delivering a cohesive vision of settler nationalism to Canadians, the migrant trunk has emerged as a powerful, but unsettling archive in popular practice. Resume L’engouement tardif pour ce qui etait autrefois un objet devalorise, la malle de bois des migrants, ou «  koffort  », au sein de la culture populaire des Islandais du Canada peut se lier aisement a la proliferation des campagnes en faveur du patrimoine visuel centre sur la migration au Canada depuis 1967. Le fait que cet objet ait reapparu, de maniere correspondante, dans les musees et les arts locaux, ainsi que dans les familles, laisse penser que les Islandais du Canada n’ont fait qu’adopter l’image commemorative statique de l’histoire telle qu’elle a ete instauree par l’Etat. Cependant, en se basant sur des entrevues et des photographies qui detaillent les usages mnemoniques de ces objets en prive, cet article permet au contraire d’avancer que la malle est un objet hybride qui presente des archives familiales et des points de contact pour des histoires traumatiques qui s’inspirent egalement des notions islandaises traditionnelles de fatalite et de systemes d’identification matrilineaires. Malgre son image publique redemptrice, la malle est souvent le vehicule par lequel se revelent les recits, centres sur les femmes, des traumatismes vecus par les migrants – abus commis par le conjoint, veuvage et mortalite infantile. Plutot que de donner aux Canadiens une image de cohesion nationale des colons, la malle des migrants est apparue comme un element d’archive puissant mais derangeant dans la pratique populaire.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.923
Threshold uncertainty score0.807

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterial Culture Review / Revue de la culture matérielleSame topicIsland Studies and Pacific AffairsFrench-language works237,207