MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1585814182

Gender justice, development and rights

2003· book· en· W1585814182 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Maxine Molyneux, Shahrashhoub Razavi

Bibliographic record

VenueRePEc: Research Papers in Economics · 2003
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender Politics and Representation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical sciencePoliticsHuman rightsDemocratizationDemocracyGender studiesPolitical economySociologyLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent years have seen a shift in the international development agenda in the direction of a greater emphasis on rights and democracy. While this has brought many positive changes in women's rights and political representation, in much of the world these advances were not matched by increases in social justice. Rising income inequalities, coupled with widespread poverty in many countries, have been accompanied by record levels of crime and violence. Meanwhile the global shift in the consensus over the role of the state in welfare provision has in many contexts entailed the down-sizing of public services and the re-allocation of service delivery to commercial interests, charitable groups, NGOs and households. Gender Justice, Development, and Rights reflects on this ambivalent record, and on the significance accorded in international development policy to rights and democracy in the post-Cold War era. Key items on the contemporary policy agenda-neo-liberal economic and social policies; democracy; and multiculturalism-are addressed here by leading scholars and regional specialists through theoretical reflections and detailed case studies. Together they constitute a collection which casts contemporary liberalism in a distinctive light by applying a gender perspective to the analysis of political and policy processes. Case studies from Latin America, sub-Saharan Africa, Middle East, East-Central Europe, South and South-east Asia contribute a cross-cultural dimension to the analysis of contemporary liberalism-the dominant value system in the modern world-and how it exists, and is resisted, in developing and post-transition societies. Contributors to this volume - Cecilia Blondet is a member of the board of directors of TRANSPARENCIA and is also a member of the Steering Committee of the Civil Society Project (Ford Foundation and the IDS-Sussex.) Diane Elson is Professor of Sociology at the University of Essex, UK. Anne Marie Goetz is Senior Fellow at the Institute of Development Studies, Sussex, UK. Shireen Hassim teaches Political Studies at the University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg, South Africa. Jacqueline Heinen is Professor at the University of Versailles St-Quentin-en-Yvelines and at Sciences Po-Paris. Aida Hernandez Castillo has a PhD in Anthropology (Stanford University 1996) and is Researcher-Professor in the Center for High Studies in Social Anthropology (CIESAS), Mexico City. Maznah Mohamad is the 2001 Visiting Chair in ASEAN and International Studies at the Munk Centre for International Studies, University of Toronto. Maxine Molyneux is Professor of Sociology at the Institute of Latin American Studies, University of London. Martha Nussbaum is Ernst Freund Distinguished Service Professor of Law and Ethics at the University of Chicago, with appointments in the Law School, the Philosophy Department, and the Center for Gender Studies Parvin Paidar works in international development. Anne Phillips is Professor of Gender Theory and Director of the Gender Institute at the London School of Economics. Stephane Portet is in charge of research at the University of Warsaw for the European network "Women in European Universities". Shahra Razavi is Research Coordinator at the United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD), Geneva. Veronica Schild is Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Western Ontario. Ramya Subrahmanian is a Fellow at the Institute of Development Studies Aili Mari Tripp is Associate Professor of Political Science and Women's Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.945
Threshold uncertainty score0.712

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsSame topicGender Politics and RepresentationFrench-language works237,207