MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1586425004 · doi:10.1161/str.45.suppl_1.tp321

Abstract T P321: Perinatal Stroke in the Canadian Cerebral Palsy Registry: Disease-Controlled Risk Factor Analysis

2014· article· en· W1586425004 on OpenAlexaffabout
Elizabeth Williams, Maryam Oskoui, Lynn Dagenais, Michael Shevell, Adam Kirton

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal and fetal brain pathology
Canadian institutionsMontreal Children's HospitalAlberta Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStroke (engine)Odds ratioRisk factorCerebral palsyPediatric strokeUnivariate analysisPopulationPediatricsPhysical therapyLogistic regressionMultivariate analysisInternal medicineIschemic stroke

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: Perinatal stroke causes most hemiparetic cerebral palsy (CP). Pathophysiology is usually idiopathic with few case-control risk factor studies. Comparisons to related disease states have not been done in perinatal stroke and may provide unique insight. The Canadian CP registry (CCPR) is multi-regional and population-based with imaging results and >70 risk factor variables. We hypothesized that CCPR perinatal stroke could be defined with distinct risk factor profiles within CP populations. Methods: The CCPR enrolls children with CP across 13 Canadian centres. Systematic chart reviews and parental interviews acquire standardized data on >150 variables including risk factors and imaging. Data current to June 2013 was extracted (RedCAP) and analyzed (SPSS). Imaging reports for hemiparetic CP cases were classified as: (1) definitive stroke, (2) probable stroke, (3) not stroke (alternate diagnosis), or (4) inconclusive. Risk factor variables were compared between definitive stroke and two disease control groups: (1) hemiparetic CP, not stroke and (2) all other CP. Univariate analysis (Chi-Square, t-test) informed multivariate logistic regression (associations expressed as odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals). Results: At extraction, 1168 children were enrolled (57% male, median 42±23mos). Hemiparetic was the single most common CP phenotype (323, 28%). Definitive perinatal stroke was common (158, 49%) compared to definitively not stroke (109, 34%). Strokes were arterial (103, 66.6%) or venous (52,33.3%). Comparing stroke to non-stroke hemiparetic CP found seven univariate associations but none persisted on multivariate analysis. Comparing stroke to other CP types, the following factors were independently associated with stroke: preeclampsia (2.35;1.11-4.95;p=0.025), prematurity (0.165;0.093-0.293; p<0.001), maternal drug use (5.03;2.05-12.35;p<0.0001) and possibly male gender (1.47;0.997-2.19;p=0.058). Conclusions: Perinatal stroke can be examined within CP registries. Disease-specific risk factors may include previously (male gender) or inconsistently (preeclampsia) reported associations and novel factors (maternal drugs). Disease-controlled approaches may inform perinatal stroke pathogenesis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.131

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0050.012
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicNeonatal and fetal brain pathology→French-language works237,207→