MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1586760826 · doi:10.5539/mas.v9n7p220

Subcritical Water Extraction of Polysaccharides Using a Semi-Batch Extractor

2015· article· en· W1586760826 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Shoko Kodama, Tetsuya Shoda, Wahyudiono Wahyudiono, Siti Machmudah, Hideki Kanda, Motonobu Goto

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Applied Science · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFungal Biology and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersPrecursory Research for Embryonic Science and TechnologyJapan Science and Technology Agency
KeywordsExtraction (chemistry)PolysaccharideWater extractionScanning electron microscopeMaterials scienceParticle (ecology)ChromatographyChemical engineeringChemistryComposite materialOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Subcritical water is an environmentally friendly method with a wide range of applications, such as extraction,hydrolysis, and wet oxidation of organic compounds. Here, water at subcritical conditions was applied to extractpolysaccharides from Ganoderma lucidum (G. lucidum) and barley grains at 120 – 180 oC and 4.0 MPa using asemi-batch system. The liquid products were directly micronized and contacted with hot air to form microsphereparticles. During extraction process, cell wall disruptions of G. lucidum and barley grains took place, allowingthe removal of the polysaccharides isolating other constituents in G. lucidum and barley grains viaautohydrolysis. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images described that the particle products produced hadsphere and wrinkled morphology of particles with diameters varying from 1 to 10 μm. The experimental resultrevealed that the particles formed from G. lucidum and barley grains extract contained 40-45% and 30-35%weight β-glucan, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.236

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern Applied ScienceSame topicFungal Biology and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207