Economía i societat a Andorra a l'edat mitjana: alguns elements de reflexió
Bibliographic record
Abstract
s impossible pretendre esbossar una descripci ms o menys slida de l'organitzaci general de la producci i del repartiment social dels productes a l'Andorra medieval: la documentaci que es pot reunir t massa llacunes.Sobre aquestes qestions, s fins i tot ben sovint muda.El ms assenyat, en conseqncia, seria certament llanar la tovallola, confessar la nostra ignorncia i intentar d'aproximar-nos al funcionament d'aquesta societat per altres camins, amb altres preguntes.Per descomptat, tanmateix, aquesta posici de prudncia metodolgica s insostenible a llarg termini.De quina manera podrem proposar una anlisi vlida de les relacions socials sense saber gens ni mica de qu vivien els actors d'aquestes relacions?Si b s cert que hi ha una mica de retrica en aquesta manera d'abordar el problema, no s pas solament pel gust de la paradoxa.Ms aviat es tracta de significar fins a quin punt no podem acceptar la nostra ignorncia en la matria.Darrere d'aquest exemple, hi ha efectivament un dilema terrible per a l'investigador: com ignorar el que no podem saber i que hauria de ser conegut imperativament?Davant de la impossibilitat de construir un saber, aquesta injunci de coneixement s una dimensi quotidiana de la feina de l'historiador, que no est prou subratllada, em sembla.Per a progressar, per a construir les nostres narracions o les nostres anlisis, hem de fer com si conegussim o com si el que ignorem noms tingus una influncia limitada o aproximadament estimable.L'important, al meu parer, no s denunciar aquest tripijoc histric sin fer-lo explcit.Aquest bricolatge de l'investigador s necessari i hi guanyarem molt si conegussim millor les maneres, el trucs, els artificis que l'historiador fa servir per neutralitzar una ignorncia ben legtima 1 .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".