MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1588132462 · doi:10.25011/cim.v30i5.2896

Phosphate balance in phosphate supplemented and unsupplemented healthy subjects during and after hypokinesia

2007· article· en· W1588132462 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kostas K. Kakuris, Kosmas B. Yerullis, Eugenios A Afoninos, Andrei K Fedorov

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical and investigative medicine · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParathyroid Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHypokinesiaInternal medicineEndocrinologyPiCalciumPhosphateUrineMedicineExcretionAnimal scienceChemistryBiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the effect of hypokinesia (HK) and post-HK on phosphate (Pi) imbalance and use of Pi with different Pi imbalance and different Pi consumption: were measured Pi balance, plasma Pi level and Pi loss during HK. METHODS: Experiments were conducted during the pre-experimental period of 30 days, and the HK period of 364-days and post-HK period of 30-days. Forty healthy male volunteers 24.2 +/- 2.0 yr, were divided into four groups: unsupplemented active control subjects (UACS), unsupplemented hypokinetic subjects (UHKS), supplemented active control subjects (SACS), and supplemented hypokinetic subjects (SHKS). All SACS and SHKS were supplemented with 0.6 mmol dicalcium-phosphate per kg body weight daily. RESULTS: During HK, Pi imbalance, serum Pi and calcium (Ca2+) levels, fecal Pi loss, and urine Ca2+ and Pi loss increased (P < 0.05) in SHKS and UHKS compared with pre-experimental values and the values in their respective active controls (SACS and UACS). The measured parameters were changed (P < 0.05) more in SHKS than in UHKS. During the initial 20-days of post-HK, serum Pi and Ca2+ levels, fecal P loss, and urine Pi and Ca2+ losses decreased (P < 0.05), while Pi imbalance remained (P < 0.05) depressed in SHKS and UHKS compared with UACS and SACS. The measured parameters were changed (P < 0.05) more in SHKS than in UHKS. CONCLUSION: The greater Pi imbalance with than without Pi supplementation shows that the risk of higher Pi imbalance is directly related to the magnitude of Pi intake. The higher Pi loss with higher than lower Pi imbalance shows that the risk of greater Pi loss is directly related to the magnitude of Pi imbalance. It is concluded that Pi imbalance increases more when the Pi consumption is higher and that Pi loss increases more with higher than lower Pi imbalance indicating that during HK Pi imbalance is due to the inability of the body to use Pi but not to the Pi shortage in the diet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical and investigative medicineSame topicParathyroid Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207