MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1588235801 · doi:10.5539/cco.v4n1p58

Cell Growth Regulated by Syndecan-1 in Human Liposarcoma

2015· article· en· W1588235801 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Shinji Tsukamoto, Keiji Shimada, Kanya Honoki, Akira Kido, Manabu Akahane, Yasuhito Tanaka, Noboru Konishi

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer and Clinical Oncology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLiposarcomaSyndecan 1Myxoid liposarcomaCancer researchBiologyGene knockdownApoptosisCell growthPathologyCellSarcomaMedicineGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The heparan sulfate proteoglycan, syndecan-1 (also known as CD138), is associated with cell proliferation, adhesion, and migration in various types of human malignancies. The role of syndecan-1 in soft tissue tumors is unknown; therefore we examined whether syndecan-1 plays a role in human liposarcoma. Materials and Methods: We performed immunohistochemical analyses of syndecan-1 in 42 liposarcoma cases, including 21 myxoid liposarcoma cases. Recurrence-free survival was estimated by the Kaplan–Meire method. We examined the association between apoptosis and syndecan-1 gene silencing in a human liposarcoma cell line. Results: The proportion of syndecan-1 positive cells (?10%) was significantly associated with unfavorable recurrence-free survival in myxoid liposarcoma patients. There were no significant associations between syndecan-1 expression and prognosis in the other subtypes of liposarcoma. Knockdown of syndecan-1 induced apoptosis and suppression of cell growth in vitro. Conclusion: Syndecan-1 could be a novel prognostic factor for myxoid liposarcoma recurrence and a new therapeutic target for human myxoid liposarcoma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.494
Threshold uncertainty score0.502

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.420
Teacher spread0.363 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer and Clinical OncologySame topicProteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans researchFrench-language works237,207