MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1588291448 · doi:10.20381/ruor-19416

The spatial ecology of Blanding's turtles (Emydoidea blandingii): from local movement patterns, home ranges and microhabitat selection to Ontario-wide habitat suitability modelling

2010· dissertation· en· W1588291448 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Catherine S. Millar

Bibliographic record

VenueuO Research (University of Ottawa) · 2010
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicTurtle Biology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHabitatEcologyGeographySelection (genetic algorithm)Home rangeMovement (music)Spatial ecologyBiologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Blanding's turtle, a semi-aquatic freshwater species found in North America, is listed as a species at risk in 17 of the 18 state/provincial jurisdictions across its range (NatureServe, 2009). Furthermore, approximately 20% of the global range of the Blanding's turtle is contained in Ontario (COSEWIC, 2005). The purpose of this study was to characterise the spatial ecology of Blanding's turtles in Ontario at multiple spatial scales, from a single island population to Ontario-wide habitat suitability modeling. I followed 38 Blanding's turtles (20 males, 13 gravid females, and 5 non-gravid females) in 2008 and 2009 on Grenadier Island in the St. Lawrence River, Ontario via radio-telemetry. Furthermore, I built habitat suitability models using historical Blanding's turtle records in Ontario and two machine learning algorithms: maximum entropy modeling (MAXENT) and boosted regression trees (BRTs). At the local scale, Blanding's turtles selected colder water with more submerged and floating vegetation and avoided open water. Reproductive class and month did not have a significant effect on the mean daily movement of turtles in May, July, and August. In June, however, gravid females moved significantly more than males. Gravid females also had significantly larger home ranges than both males and non-gravid females. At the landscape level, Blanding's turtle habitat suitability was best predicted by air temperature, wetland area, open water area, cropland area, and road density. Habitat suitability increased with increasing air temperature, wetland area, forested area, alvar area, bedrock outcrop area, and decreased with increasing cropland area, pastures and field area, precipitations, terrain ruggedness, and settlements and developed land. Mean area under the operating curve (AUC) values for habitat suitability models tested on independent data ranged from 0.878 to 0.912. My results highlight the importance of stratifying spatial analyses by reproductive class and time and of including terrestrial habitat in management plans for Blanding's turtles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.815
Threshold uncertainty score0.878

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueuO Research (University of Ottawa)Same topicTurtle Biology and ConservationFrench-language works237,207