MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1588345304 · doi:10.7176/nmmc.vol3310-16

A Fantasy-Theme Analysis of the Reportage “The China Diaries – Discovering the New China along the Trail of the Long March” in the Global and Mail

2015· article· en· W1588345304 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Liwei Zhang, Muhammad Babar Jamil

Bibliographic record

VenueJournals & Books Hosting (International Knowledge Sharing Platform) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicRhetoric and Communication Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersChina Scholarship Council
KeywordsFantasyChinaTheme (computing)ProsperityNewspaperSymbolic convergence theorySociologyConvergence (economics)HistoryMedia studiesLiteraturePolitical scienceLawComputer scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Drawing upon Bormann's symbolic convergence theory, this paper explores how the concept of home is as significant as it was to Chinese people's daily lives since the Long March.To this end, this paper provides a fantasy-theme analysis of the series of images in "The China Diaries -Discovering the New China along the Trail of the Long March" published in the electronic version of the Canadian newspaper The Global and Mail.The analysis shows that the theme of home, and the three forms of the rhetorical vision Long March (respectively, as a pragmatic and tactical military strategy, in terms of being a historical event; as a social strategy, in terms of uniting people; and as a strategy of righteousness, in terms of representing transcendent values associated with the ideals of modern Chinese society), play significant roles in Chinese people's everyday lives.I conclude that although the Long March era has passed, its spirit still inspires Chinese people to strive for the betterment of their own and the whole country's prosperity wherever they are.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.557
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournals & Books Hosting (International Knowledge Sharing Platform)Same topicRhetoric and Communication StudiesFrench-language works237,207