Reduced Common Carotid Artery Blood Flow in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats is Unaffected by Aging and/or Chronic In Vivo Resveratrol Treatment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study examined common carotid artery (CCA) blood flow (using a perivascular flowprobe) and pressure (using a catheter‐tip transducer) in anesthetized Adult (20‐24 wk old) and Aging (60‐70 wk old) Wistar Kyoto rats (WKY) and Spontaneously Hypertensive rats (SHR) following 28‐days of in vivo treatment (in drinking water, ab libitum) with either no trans resveratrol (RSV; No‐RSV), a moderate RSV dose (Mod‐RSV; ~0.075 mg/kg/day; to mimic daily red wine consumption), or a high RSV dose (High‐RSV; ~7.5 mg/kg/day). CCA mean, maximal systolic, minimum diastolic, and pulse pressure, and heart rate, were all significantly elevated in SHR vs. WKY (p<0.01). Aging was associated with a significant increase in pulse pressure in WKY (p<0.01). CCA mean, maximal systolic, and minimum diastolic blood flow, and vascular conductance, were all significantly reduced in SHR vs. WKY (p<0.05). Aging did not have a significant effect on the flow parameters in either SHR or WKY. Neither Mod‐RSV nor High‐RSV treatment had a significant effect on the CCA blood pressure and blood flow variables measured. These data demonstrate that the reduction in CCA blood flow found in SHR is unaffected by aging or chronic in vivo RSV treatment. Further investigation into what can account for and alter the reduced CCA blood flow found in SHR is warranted. Funded by NSERC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".