Community economic development and the rise of ethno‐cultural entrepreneurialism in francophone Manitoba
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article examines the evolving concept and practice of “cultural entrepreneurialism.” Drawing on interviews with community‐based organizations in francophone Manitoba, it extends research on “social entrepreneurialism” by investigating the increasing role played by ethno‐cultural organizations in community economic development. A thematic analysis reveals how community economic development has been adapted to historically—and geographically—grounded cultural and institutional legacies. The findings show how Franco‐Manitoban community organizations formulated a particular mix of social entrepreneurialism infused with cultural practice and upheld an expansive view of community economic development. Scholars need to consider how everyday cultural practices and ethno‐cultural territory influence how community‐based organizations engage in local economic development. Le développement économique communautaire et l'essor de l'entrepreneuriat ethnoculturel au Manitoba français Cet article s'intéresse au concept et à la pratique en évolution de « l'entrepreneuriat culturel ». Se fondant sur des entrevues menées auprès d'organismes communautaires du Manitoba français, l'article s'inscrit dans le prolongement des travaux de recherche en cours sur « l'entrepreneuriat social » en explorant le rôle grandissant joué par les organisations ethnoculturelles dans le développement économique communautaire. Une analyse par thème laisse entrevoir comment le développement économique communautaire a fait l'objet d'aménagements établis sur les bases historiques et géographiques du patrimoine culturel et institutionnel. Il en ressort que les organisations communautaires francophones du Manitoba ont pu mettre au point leur propre vision qui conjugue l'entrepreneuriat social à la pratique culturelle et ainsi défendre une perspective plus étendue du développement économique communautaire. Une des questions que les chercheurs doivent se poser est celle de l'influence que peuvent exercer les pratiques culturelles quotidiennes et le territoire ethnoculturel sur la manière dont les organisations communautaires se lancent dans le développement économique local.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".