The Last Dance of the Phoenix or The De-Discovery of the Archival Fonds
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le principe de provenance, probablement plus encore en Europe que dans le reste du monde, entrane de la confusion et des dbats intenses entre archivistes.Les racines de ce principe semblent tre dans le respect des fonds, exprim en France en 1841, mais elles remontent en fait encore plus loin et manquent l'origine de tout fondement thorique.La diversit des pratiques administratives dans les traditions europennes n'a pas contribu un rel consensus, tant pour la dfinition du fonds, que pour la question de savoir si l'ordre primitif des documents doit tre prserv ou restor.Dans les pays o la tradition du registre central existe, les archivistes ont tendance respecter l'ordre original alors qu'ailleurs, les archivistes le trouve encombrant.Mais mme le fonds comme entit respecter est remis en cause, puisque les changements administratifs brouillent souvent ses limites.Pourquoi les archivistes travers le monde tentent-ils de respecter un concept ou une situation qui pose tant de problmes?Pourquoi les penseurs dans le domaine de l'archivistique tentent-ils autant comme autant de rsoudre le casse-tte caus par l'indiscipline de leurs documents?Pourquoi tentent-ils de faire entrer toutes les situations dans un mme paradigme?Pourquoi le Phoenix renat-il toujours de ses cendres?C'est par une relecture de la littrature existante, tant europenne, nord-amricaine qu'australienne, que l'auteur tente de dcouvrir de nouveaux modles.ABSTRACT Probably even more in Europe than in the rest of the world the principle of provenance caused confusion and heavy debates among archivists.Its roots seem to be in the respect des fonds, expressed in France in 1841, but as a matter of fact are much older and initially lacked any kind of theoretical foundation.The diversity in administrative practice in various European traditions did not contribute to a real consensus, either about what a fonds is, or whether the original order should be preserved or restored.In those traditions where strong registry systems exist (or existed) archivists tend to respect the original order, whereas in other traditions archivists may find it cumbersome.But even the fonds as an entity to respect is challenged, since often administrative changes in the originating administration blurred its boundaries.Why * This paper is a substantially revised and reworked version of one given at the ACA conference, Vancouver, 24 May, 2002.I am most grateful to Terry Cook
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it