Une Acadie triangulaire : Essai de géo-esthétique (première version)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The arts are one of the privileged expressions of culture and are also the expression of a community’s identity. The Acadian culture of New Brunswick is no exception. In this essay, the author examines the geographical constitution of Acadia to reveal distinct features of what he considers to be three important sectors of social activity: culture, politics, and economy. In light of ongoing activities in the fields of visual arts, literature, music, and filmmaking, it becomes clear that the Acadian regions of the South West, the Acadian peninsula, and the region of Marevie display divergences and concordances that are quite similar in each of these cultural manifestations. Resume Les arts constituent l’une des expressions privilegiees de la culture qui elle-meme se veut l’expression identitaire d’une collectivite. La culture acadienne du Nouveau-Brunswick n’y fait pas exception. Dans cet essai, l’auteur examine la constitution geographique de l’Acadie pour y voir des particularites se rapportant a ce qu’il considere comme les trois grands secteurs de l’activite sociale : soit la culture, la politique et l’economie. En se basant sur l’activite ayant cours dans les arts visuels, la litterature, la musique et le cinema, on se rend compte que les regions acadiennes du sud-est, de la Peninsule acadienne et de la region Marevie offrent des divergences et des concordances assez similaires en ce qui a trait a leur identite culturelle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".