MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1589453135 · doi:10.1186/1897-4287-10-s2-a33

Substantial unexplained variation in cancer risks for MLH1 and MSH2 mutation carriers

2012· article· en· W1589453135 on OpenAlexaff
JG Dowty, Aung Ko Win, Daniel D. Buchanan, Robert J. MacInnis, Noralane M. Lindor, SN Thibodeau, Graham Casey, Steven Gallinger, Polly A. Newcomb, Robert W. Haile, Jack Goldblatt, S Parry, FA Macrae, JL Hopper, Mark A. Jenkins

Bibliographic record

VenueHereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGenetic factors in colorectal cancer
Canadian institutionsMount Sinai HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMLH1PenetranceProbandFamily historyCancerMSH2Colorectal cancerPopulationOncologyInternal medicineMutationGeneticsEnvironmental healthDNA mismatch repairGeneBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Germline mutations in the DNA mismatch repair genes MLH1 and MSH2 are associated with substantially increased risks of colorectal cancer (CRC), endometrial cancer (EC) and certain other cancers. Due to the rarity of these mutations, previous studies have been underpowered to provide precise estimates of risks. We studied 167 MLH1 and 225 MSH2 mutation-carrying families comprising 17,352 members from the Colon Cancer Family Registry. Probands were recruited either because they had a family history of cancer (n=274) or from cancer registries independently of family history (n=118). Hazard ratios (HRs) of cancer risks for carriers compared with the general population and age-specific cumulative risks for carriers (penetrance) were estimated using modified segregation analysis conditioned on ascertainment. Heterogeneity in risks for carriers was modelled with a polygenic risk modifier (as in the BOADICEA model). The age-specific incidence of CRC for male MLH1 mutation carriers was estimated to be 222 times (95% CI: 152-324) that for the population at ages 40 years and younger but only 6.1 times higher (95% CI: 2.4-15.5) after age 60 years. This decline (p<0.0001) in the CRC HR with age was also evident for female MLH1 mutation carriers (p=0.002) but was less marked. Male MLH1 mutation carriers on average had higher CRC HRs than female carriers (p=0.004). The estimated CRC HRs for MSH2 mutation carriers were similar to those for MLH1 , with any differences consistent with chance (p>0.3). The estimated EC HRs also decreased sharply with age (p=0.0004 and 0.001 for MLH1 and MSH2 , respectively) and no difference by gene was observed (p=0.7). There was strong evidence for an unmeasured polygenic modifier of risk (p<0.0001). The estimated average cumulative risks (95% CI) of CRC to age 70 years were 44% (35-54) for male carriers and 38% (30-48) for female carriers, and corresponding EC risks were 22% (14-31). However for carriers in the lowest vs. highest quartiles of polygenic risk (respectively) these were 4.9% vs. 93% for male CRC, 3.5% vs. 88% for female CRC and 1.5% vs. 59% for EC. This international study shows that, although the average cancer risks for MLH1 and MSH2 mutation carriers are similar, there is substantial unexplained variation in risks due to differences by mutation or by genetic or environmental modifiers. This finding has implications for the counselling and clinical management of mutation carriers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.126
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.143
GPT teacher head0.483
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHereditary Cancer in Clinical PracticeSame topicGenetic factors in colorectal cancerFrench-language works237,207