MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1589849201 · doi:10.1071/rdv17n2ab233

233 EXPRESSION AND LOCALIZATION OF DNMT1 DURING EARLY BOVINE DEVELOPMENT

2004· article· en· W1589849201 on OpenAlexaff
Deanna Russell, Dean H. Betts

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAnimal Genetics and Reproduction
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoNemzeti Kutatási és Technológiai HivatalPfizerFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas GeraisDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftU.S. Department of Agriculture
KeywordsGerminal vesicleBlastocystBiologyAndrologyDNA methylationEmbryogenesisEmbryoOocyteDNMT1Molecular biologyGene expressionCell biologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

DNA methylation of CG motifs is an important mechanism of transcriptional regulation. During embryonic development DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) has been implicated in the maintainance of gametic and embryonic epigenetic patterns. Here we report the characterization of DNMT1 expression patterns within in vitro-produced (IVP) bovine embryos. Cumulus-oocyte complexes were recovered from slaughterhouse ovaries and either denuded (germinal vesicle, GV) or matured in vitro for 24 h (metaphase II, MII). Embryos at the 1-, 2-, 4-, 8-, 16-cell stage, and morula (Mo, Day 6 post-insemination, p.i.) and blastocyst (Days 7, 8, and 9 p.i.) stages were produced by in vitro fertilization and cultured in SOFm for appropriate times under a 5% O2, 5% CO2, and 90% N2 atmosphere. Oocytes/embryos were either snap frozen (-80°C) for DNMT1 mRNA and protein expression profiles analysis or wholemount fixed and permeabilized for DNMT1 immunostaining followed by laser confocal microscopy. DNMT1 RNA, determined by real-time PCR analysis, was present throughout bovine embryonic development (replications = 3, n = 10 embryos/pool and normalized by Histone H2A expression). Growing oocytes accumulated DNMT1 transcripts until the MII stage (20-fold increase), whereas after fertilization DNMT1 RNA levels decreased and remained constant until the 16-cell stage when DNMT1 RNA levels decreased further and then remains constant until the blastocyst (Day 8 p.i.) stage. Confocal analysis of DNMT1 immunostained oocytes/embryos (n = 20/stage) revealed that DNMT1 is localized in the cytoplasm of the oocyte and pre-implantation embryo with the exception of the 16-cell stage, when the enzyme is translocated to nucleus (confirmed by Hoechst co-localization). Moreover, a punctuate staining pattern was observed for DNMT1, which could be due to its association with the mitochondria or endoplasmic reticulum. Interestingly, in GV oocytes DNMT1 was present in localized areas of the nucleus, suggestive of nucleoli association. DNMT1 was observed in the majority of the nuclei in early blastocysts, while after expansion, DNMT1 accumulated in the cytoplasm of the trophectoderm and was localized in both the cytoplasm and the nucleus of the majority of cells within the inner cell mass. Western blot analysis revealed low levels of DNMT1 protein in oocytes and pre-implantation embryos with the exception of the 16-cell embryos and Mo stages during which a significant (P < 0.05) increase in the levels of DNMT1 protein was observed. Specificity of primers and conditions for the real-time PCR assay were confirmed by cDNA sequencing whereas specificity of the antibody used for immunofluorescence and western blot analysis was confirmed by amino acid sequencing. These results suggest the participation of DNMT1 in the bovine embryonic genome activation process, supporting a passive DNA demethylation process during the early cleavage stages in the bovine. The low expression profile of DNMT1 after morula stage indicates that other methylases are required for the maintenance of DNA methylation during blastocyst formation and expansion. This work was funded by CFIA, NSERC, CIHR, and OMAF.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.355
Threshold uncertainty score0.462

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicAnimal Genetics and ReproductionFrench-language works237,207