L’intégration du blogue de dirigeant dans une stratégie de communication interne : cas d’une institution municipale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’integration des blogues dans le milieu organisationnel participe de plusieurs phenomenes communicationnels et sociaux. En nous referant aux approches de la communication interne (Morel, 2002), nous explorons les caracteristiques et les modes de communication associes au blogue de dirigeant dans une organisation municipale. Notre cas nous a permis d’analyser les utilisations que les employes font du blogue et d’examiner les facteurs qui influencent son usage. Les resultats de cette etude demontrent que les employes se servent du blogue comme moyen d’information plutot que de communication. Bien que cet outil ait permis aux employes de connaitre les nouvelles de la direction et les projets des collegues se retrouvant sur des sites eloignes, leur participation demeure tres limitee. En fait, plusieurs facteurs contextuels dont la structure organisationnelle, les themes et la frequence des publications ainsi que la formule technique preconisee de blogue influencent son utilisation. Integrating blogs in an organizational setting contributes to several communicational and social phenomena. However, most studies focus on the technical aspects of blogs from a normative perspective. With reference to the approaches of internal communication (Morel, 2002), we explore the characteristics and modes of communication associated with a manager blog in a municipal organization. Our case study allows us to examine the factors that influence the use of blog. Although this tool has allowed employees to get news from the management and information about their co-workers located on remote sites, their participation is still very limited. In fact, a number of contextual factors, including organizational structure, themes, frequency of publications, and the technical setting of the blog influence its use.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".