MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Tadalafil administered once daily for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia: a 1‐year, open‐label extension study

2011· article· en· W1590209850 on OpenAlex
Craig F. Donatucci, Gerald Brock, Evan R. Goldfischer, Peter Pommerville, Albert Elion‐Mboussa, J. Kissel, Lars Viktrup

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Urology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Canadian institutionsSt Joseph's Health Care
FundersEli Lilly and Company
KeywordsTadalafilMedicineLower urinary tract symptomsErectile dysfunctionPlaceboAdverse effectVardenafilcGMP-specific phosphodiesterase type 5UrologyUrinary systemBenign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)Internal medicineProstate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Study Type – Therapy (cohort) Level of Evidence 2b What’s known on the subject? and What does the study add? Phosphodiesterase type‐5 (PDE5) inhibitors (tadalafil, vardenafil, and sildenafil) are well‐known treatment options for men with erectile dysfunction and should be taken before anticipated sexual activity. Tadalafil is also approved for once daily use in men with erectile dysfunction. Recent 12‐week studies in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) have shown once daily use of tadalafil significantly reduced their urinary symptoms. This article is the first to report the long‐term safety and maintenance of efficacy for once‐daily use of tadalafil in men with urinary symptoms secondary to BPH. OBJECTIVE • To evaluate the 1‐year safety of 5 mg of tadalafil once daily in men with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH‐LUTS); efficacy measures were included to evaluate the maintenance of efficacy after an additional year of treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS • In total, 427 men who completed a 12‐week, placebo‐controlled, dose‐ finding study assessing once‐daily tadalafil (2.5, 5, 10 or 20 mg) or placebo elected to continue into the open‐label extension period. Safety and efficacy parameters were assessed after 1 month and every 3 months. RESULTS • In total, 299 patients (69.9%) completed the 1‐year, open‐label extension period. Treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported by 57.6% of patients, with most TEAEs being mild (44%) or moderate (45%) in severity; the most common TEAEs (≥2%) were dyspepsia, gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease, back pain, headache, sinusitis, hypertension and cough. Twenty‐two patients (5.2%) discontinued as a result of AEs. During the open‐label extension period, mean prostate‐specific antigen increased from 1.6 ± 1.3 ng/mL to 1.8 ± 1.4 ng/mL. • Mean post‐void residual volume was 61.1 ± 60.4 mL at study entry and 42.2 ± 64.1 mL after the open‐label extension period. Changes in the total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), IPSS irritative and obstructive subscores, IPSS health‐related quality of life and BPH Impact Index were maintained after 1 year. In sexually‐active patients with erectile dysfunction, improvements in the International Index of Erectile Function–Erectile Function domain were maintained after 1 year. CONCLUSION • In men with BPH‐LUTS, 5 mg of tadalafil once daily during 1 year of treatment was well tolerated and efficacy changes were maintained.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.381
Threshold uncertainty score0.871

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it