Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El estudio del derecho de frontera ha sido minusvalorado durante los últimos años y aún quedan grandes lagunas en su conocimiento que nos impiden conocer las estrechas relaciones que unen a los textos que lo forman. En este artículo se ha intentado subsanar esta carencia y se ha abordado el estudio de un fuero de reducida extensión como Valfermoso de las Monjas. El análisis se ha hecho a tres niveles: estructura, redacción y vocabulario, hallándose significativos paralelismos entre este texto y otro tan importante como Uclés. La conclusión a la que se llega es que la fundación de esta villa vino acompañada de la formulación de un derecho propio basado en una tradición preexistente en la región. Esta tradición no era oral sino que estaba plasmada por escrito en un texto que tuvo amplia difusión en los señoríos eclesiásticos.The study of the border law has been abandoned for years and there are still large gaps in their knowledge that prevent us from knowing the close ties between the texts. This article has tried to remedy this deficiency with the study of a charter of small size as Valfermoso de las Monjas. The analysis has been made at three levels: structure, writing and vocabulary, finding significant parallels between this text and another as important as Uclés. The conclusion that can be reached is that the foundation of this town was accompanied by the establishment of a law based on a pre-existing tradition in the region. This tradition was not oral but rather was written in a text that had wide circulation in the ecclesiastical domains.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it