Subclass‐Specific Localization and Trafficking of<scp>A</scp>rabidopsis<scp>p</scp>24 Proteins in the<scp>ER</scp>–<scp>G</scp>olgi Interface
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We describe a comprehensive analysis of the subcellular localization and in vivo trafficking of Arabidopsis p24 proteins. In Arabidopsis, there are 11 p24 proteins, which fall into only δ and β subfamilies. Interestingly, the δ subfamily of p24 proteins in Arabidopsis is elaborated spectacularly in evolution, which can be grouped into two subclasses: p24δ1 and p24δ2. We found that, although all p24δ proteins possess classic COPII/COPI binding motifs in their cytosolic C-termini, p24δ1 proteins are localized to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), p24δ2 proteins are localized to both ER and Golgi. Two p24β proteins reside largely in Golgi. Similar to Atp24 (termed p24δ1c in this study), p24δ2d also cycles between the ER and Golgi. Interestingly, coexpression with p24β1 could retain p24δ2d, but not p24δ1d in Golgi. We revealed that the lumenal coiled-coil domain of p24δ2d is required for its steady-state localization in Golgi, probably through its interaction with p24β1. In p24β1, there is no classic COPII or COPI binding motif in its C-terminus. However, the protein also cycles between the ER and Golgi. We found that a conserved RV motif located at the extreme end of the C-terminus of p24β1 plays an important role in its Golgi target.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".