MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1590914486 · doi:10.22230/jem.2012v13n1a196

Hydrology Modelling and Decision-Support Tool for Northeast British Columbia

2012· article· en· W1590914486 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Suzan Lapp, Allan R. Chapman

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Ecosystems and Management · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBritish Columbia Oil and Gas Commission
KeywordsHydrology (agriculture)Decision support systemGeographyEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental resource managementWater resource managementComputer scienceGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O n January 11, 2012, the British Columbia Oil and Gas Commission (BCOGC) hosted a workshop and discussion session in Vancouver, BC to present the Hydrology Modelling and Decision-Support Tool they have developed to assist with future water decisions in northeast BC.The session was led by Allan Chapman (BCOGC) and Ben Kerr (Foundry Spatial).Participants included representatives from the Ministry of Environment, Ministry of Forest Lands and Natural Resource Operations, Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers, Ministry of Energy and Mines, as well as from Geoscience BC, Environment Canada, the University of British Columbia, the University of Victoria, and FORREX.The issue at hand is the large volumes of water required for unconventional natural gas extraction (i.e., hydrologic fracturing) and lack of hydro-meteorological data to guide water licence-issuing decisions.Sources of water for gas extraction are derived from surface flows (freshwater), confined or unconfined shallow aquifers (<600m), and deep aquifers (>600m) disconnected from the surface, which are usually saline.The hydrological model focuses solely on the surface water source (small and large rivers and lakes) to provide the best representation of the surface hydrology in northeast BC.Information about the water availability (flows) is generated on monthly, seasonal, and annual scales -all of which are required to issue and regulate short-term water licence approvals (<1 year) and long-term water licences.The model will assist in management decisions and determine thresholds where winter flows are not sufficient to support withdrawals and water under the Water Act 1996 for water allocation and will address environmental and instream flow needs.The hydrologic model is based on a simple water balance continuity equation and is derived from gridded temperature, precipitation, evapotranspiration, and land cover data.The model is calibrated to about 50 Water Survey of Canada gauges located in northeast BC and adjacent areas in Alberta and the Northwest Territories.The final product will consist of a GIS-based "Decision-Support Tool" to inform short-term water licences or approvals and is expected to be available in Fall 2012.For more information see "Hydrological Modelling and Decision-Support Tool Development for Water Allocation, Northeastern British Columbia (Chapman, Kerr, & Wilford 2012) at http://www.geosciencebc.com/i/pdf/SummaryofActivities2011/SoA2011_Chapman.pdf .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.101
Threshold uncertainty score0.204

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Ecosystems and ManagementSame topicGeological Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207