MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1591063089 · doi:10.1002/9780470697405.ch12

Genetic and Therapeutic Control of Diabetogenic CD8 <sup>+</sup> T Cells

2008· article· en· W1591063089 on OpenAlexaff
Pere Santamaría

Bibliographic record

VenueNovartis Foundation symposium · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDiabetes and associated disorders
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and ImmunityUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNOD miceBiologyCytotoxic T cellCD8T cellInsulitisImmunologyT-cell receptorIL-2 receptorEpitopeNodAntigenCell biologyImmune systemAutoimmunityEndocrinologyDiabetes mellitusBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CD8+ T cells are important contributors to the initiation and progression of type 1 diabetes (T1D). A very significant fraction of islet-associated CD8 T cells in NOD mice recognize epitopes of islet-specific glucose-6-phosphatase catalytic subunit-related protein (IGRP), a non-essential endoplasmic reticulum-resident protein of unclear function. IGRP is also a target of CD8 T cell responses in human T1D patients. In NOD mice, most IGRP-reactive CD8 T cells target the IGRP(206-214) epitope and are diabetogenic. We have shown that the pathogenic activity of this T cell subset is controlled by genetic elements associated with diabetes susceptibility and resistance. One of these elements (Il2) has been recently implicated in susceptibility to several human autoimmune disorders, including TID. In mice, Il2 polymorphisms control a negative feedback mechanism initiated by activated, IL2-producing autoreactive T cells in the pancreatic lymph nodes that increases the regulatory activity of CD4+CD25+ T cells. Not all IGRP-reactive CD8 T cell clones are pathogenic, however, and we have evidence that some of these clonotypes are actually anti-diabetogenic. We had previously shown that administration of altered peptide ligands (APL) targeting IGRP(206-214)-reactive CD8 T cells resulted in diabetes protection only at doses that did not delete low-avidity clones, suggesting a protective role for these clonotypes. I discuss evidence showing that transgenic expression of a low-avidity IGRP(206-214)-reactive T cell receptor (TCR) efficiently prevents the development of insulitis and diabetes in NOD (non-obese diabetic) mice and that these cells do so by killing autoantigen-loaded antigen presenting cells in the pancreas-draining lymph nodes. These results illustrate a novel mechanism for regulation of immune responses to self-antigens and expose a new target for therapeutic intervention. Here I briefly summarize work done by us and others indicating that a prevalent subset of autoreactive CD8 T-cells in the NOD mouse are major (albeit likely dispensable) players in the pathogenesis of spontaneous autoimmune diabetes in the NOD mouse; that these T cells are targets of genetic elements affording autoimmune disease susceptibility and resistance; that they can either be diabetogenic or anti-diabetogenic according to their avidity for peptide/MHC; and that they can serve as useful targets for therapeutic intervention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.139
Threshold uncertainty score0.588

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNovartis Foundation symposiumSame topicDiabetes and associated disordersFrench-language works237,207