MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1591250040

Gillian Roberts. Prizing Literature: The Celebration and Circulation of National Culture

2013· article· en· W1591250040 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Joel Deshaye

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian ethnic studies · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsSubject (documents)CommonwealthExcellenceLiteratureHistoryMedia studiesSociologyArt historyArtLawPolitical scienceLibrary science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gillian Roberts. Prizing Literature: The Celebration and Circulation of National Culture. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2011. 261 pp. Bibliography. Index. $45.00 hc. In Prizing Literature, Gillian Roberts argues that awards for prose fiction are partly intended to naturalize immigrant writers and their works. She also demonstrates how these writers resist their adopted national culture in Canada. Interpreting their fiction, Roberts discovers that they are concerned with same questions of hospitality and citizenship that prizes themselves raise. She has written an instructive book for academics in literary and cultural studies. Prizing Literature has six chapters, beginning with an overview of three Canadian literary awards and three extranational awards: Governor General's Award for English-language fiction, Giller Prize, CBC's Canada Reads, and then Booker, Pulitzer, and Commonwealth Writers' Prizes. Her overview shows that these prizes are significant to aesthetics, culture, and economy, often simultaneously, as when promoters of lucrative Giller Prize are shown to be disingenuous (29) in presuming to judge, without political bias, excellence of writing. The following four chapters each focus on a different author: Michael Ondaatje, Carol Shields, Rohinton Mistry, and Yann Martel, each chapter a sequence of literary and cultural analyses integrated with basic biographical information. The conclusion turns for several pages to issue of how native writers such as Lee Maracle and Thomas King respond to claims of national belonging asserted in Canadian literary culture. This latter subject deserves a book-length study of its own, and Roberts is well-equipped to do it, or has led way for others. The main point of book is not surprising, but it is timely, nuanced, and well-supported by a variety of critical methods. Roberts argues that prose fiction of Ondaatje, Shields, Mistry, and Martel examines the distinction between citizenship and nationality, exposing degrees of belonging and unbelonging, and complication of national claims as perpetuated by host cultures (10). Although all these writers have accepted literary awards that promote Canadian nationalism to some extent, their stories also describe inconsistencies and more serious flaws, such as xenophobia and racism, in hospitality in this country. The extensive analysis of book reviews in Prizing Literature demonstrates that degree of hospitality around Canadian literature is encouraging but not without territoriality. Despite these issues, and partly because of prizes they have won, Ondaatje, Shields, Mistry, and Martel all seem to appreciate Canada as a country in which to write; Mistry has been especially critical of Canadian inhospitality in his book, Family Matters, and yet he also says that he is at ease (qtd. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.888
Threshold uncertainty score0.539

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian ethnic studiesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207