Structural Basis for α1 Versus α2 Isoform-distinct Behavior of the Na,K-ATPase
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We showed earlier that the kinetic behavior of the alpha2 isoform of the Na,K-ATPase differs from the ubiquitous alpha1 isoform primarily by a shift in the steady-state E(1)/E(2) equilibrium of alpha2 in favor of E(1) form(s). The aim of the present study was to identify regions of the alpha chain that confer the alpha1/alpha2 distinct behavior using a mutagenesis and chimera approach. Criteria to assess shifts in conformational equilibrium included (i) K(+) sensitivity of Na-ATPase measured at micromolar ATP, under which condition E(2)(K(+)) --> E(1) + K(+) becomes rate-limiting, (ii) changes in K'(ATP) for low affinity ATP binding, (iii) vanadate sensitivity of Na,K-ATPase activity, and (iv) the rate of the partial reaction E(1)P --> E(2)P. We first confirmed that interactions between the cytoplasmic domains of alpha2 that modulate conformational shifts are fundamentally similar to those of alpha1, suggesting that the predilection of alpha2 for E(1) state(s) is due to differences in primary structure of the two isoforms. Kinetic behavior of the alpha1/alpha2 chimeras indicates that the difference in E(1)/E(2) poise of the two isoforms cannot be accounted for by their notably distinct N termini, but rather by the front segment extending from the cytoplasmic N terminus to the C-terminal end of the extracellular loop between transmembranes 3 and 4, with a lesser contribution of the alpha1/alpha2 divergent portion within the M4-M5 loop near the ATP binding domain. In addition, we show that the E(1) shift of alpha2 results primarily from differences in the conformational transition of the dephosphoenzyme, (E(2)(K(+)) --> E(1) + K(+)), rather than phosphoenzyme (E(1)P --> E(2)P).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".