Analytical and computational investigation into the influence of the compressive stress cycles on crack growth under variable amplitude loading using CTOD
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Fatigue crack growth rate of 6061 T651 aluminum alloy centre‐cracked plates, subject to a variable amplitude loading (VAL), is established using a coupled analytical/computational approach. The method utilises the generalised Willenborg retardation model in conjunction with the Walker model, with several of the models parameters obtained through nonlinear finite element analyses. A two‐parameter approach is also used in this study to explore the influence of compressive stress cycles in a VAL scenario on the crack tip opening displacement, and in turn, on the resulting fatigue crack growth rate of the material. The work includes the evaluation of the crack tip opening displacement and residual stresses in the vicinity of a crack by nonlinear finite element analysis, and application of the Generalised Willenborg model to evaluate the fatigue crack growth; particularly, under the influence of the compressive stress cycles, tensile overloads and underloads have been investigated. The finite element analysis results are compared with the experimental results reported in earlier studies by the authors. The results further demonstrate two important phenomena, that is, (i) the influence of FCG retardation effects due to the tensile overloads and (ii) the acceleration effect due to the applied compressive underloads of a VAL stress–time history.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".