Citizenship, Immigration, and Identity in Winterveld, South Africa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image sizeRésuméL’avènement d’un gouvernement démocratique en Afrique du sud a déplacé les termes et les conditions de la participation dans la société civile et la vie nationale. Autrefois, les sud-africains noirs et les immigrants de pays voisins partageaient un statut et une identité communs en tant qu’étrangers. En 1994, les limites entre l’inclusion et l’exclusion ont été redéfinies. Cet article examine les implications de ce processus pour les relations entre Sud-africains et immigrants dans la région du Winterveld. Winterveld est intéressant à cause de son histoire. En effet, la région a pratique les évacuations forcées de l’apartheid, a simultanément créé des villages d’immigrants et là les Africains du sud et les résidents venus d’ailleurs ont partagé l’identité d”étrangers.” Cet article montre que les attitudes locales et officielles à l’égard des non Sud-africains ont changé négativement, rapidement et de manière dramatique. Ensuite, l’article examine l’impact de ce processus sur la fragmentation de la société civile et les stratégies de survie locales mises en place par les immigrants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".