Abstract 2987: Evaluation of CTLA-4 blockage with sequential metronomic chemotherapy for the treatment of preclinical breast cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The targeting of the CTLA-4 protein with the antibody ipilimumab has been a success in terms of producing an increase in the survival of patients with unresectable melanoma, and clinical trials are ongoing to evaluate this strategy in other tumor types. Our aim in this study was to evaluate the combination of CTLA-4 blocking with metronomic chemotherapy regimens. To that end, we subcutaneously implanted murine EMT-6 breast tumor cells into syngeneic Balb/c mice (n=6-8/group) and evaluated therapies on the established tumors. Murine CTLA-4 blocking was achieved using anti-mouse CD152 (CTLA-4), clone 9H10, injected on day 1 (100ug/mouse) and on day 6 (35ug/mouse) of therapy. Anti-CTLA-4 therapy was administered on its own or combined with metronomic regimens. These included; a) Bolus (150mg/kg, i.p.) cyclophosphamide (CTX) followed by metronomic CTX (20mg/kg/day, p.o.), b) metronomic CTX, and c) sequential gemcitabine therapy (160mg/kg every 3 days, i.p.) given to the tumors relapsing after the anti-CTLA-4 therapy. We observed that control (saline) treated tumors, or tumors treated with Bolus CTX plus metronomic CTX, grew rapidly and had to be sacrificed 4 weeks after tumor implantation. Anti-CTLA-4 monotherapy produced an initial tumor regression followed by tumor relapses, 2-3 weeks later, in 5/6 mice. Surprisingly, the Bolus CTX plus metronomic CTX hindered the effective CTLA-4 therapy, failed to produce tumor regression, and resulted in rapidly growing tumors. The combination of anti-CTLA-4 plus metronomic CTX also produced tumor regression and resulted in a longer delay in the appearance of relapsing tumors (p<0.05 compared to anti-CTLA-4 alone), which also eventually appeared in 5/6 mice. A Kaplan Meier plot showed that the anti-CTLA-4 plus metronomic CTX regimen significantly improved survival compared to the anti-CTLA-4 monotherapy (p<0.05). The regimen involving first line anti-CTLA4 therapy followed by a second line gemcitabine therapy, produced a sustained tumor regression that continued for over 100 days. In this group, 5/7 mice did not show a tumor regrowth; 1 mouse showed a tumor regrowth under continuous gemcitabine therapy with concomitant development of lung metastasis. Tumor cells lines were derived from the relapsing tumor and from the lung metastasis. Collectively our data shows that Bolus plus metronomic CTX may compromise anti-CTLA-4 therapy. Furthermore, anti-CTLA-4 therapy may be effectively combined with metronomic CTX, or with a sequential gemcitabine therapy, in a preclinical model of breast cancer. Citation Format: Karla Parra, Chantal Vidal, Paloma Valenzuela, Sarah Jallad, Georgialina Rodriguez, Mitchell S. Felder, Natzidielly Lerma, Guido Bocci, Urban Emmenegger, Robert A. Kirken, Giulio Francia. Evaluation of CTLA-4 blockage with sequential metronomic chemotherapy for the treatment of preclinical breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 2987. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-2987
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".